Stop scrolling! This Linux bundle is almost gone. ⏱️
Get $600+ of No Starch books for cheap. 💰
*partner link*
Humble Tech Book Bundle: Linux, the Good Stuff by No Starch
Unlock new levels of freedom and creativity when you use Linux—master the ins and outs of Linux today and help support charity!Humble Bundle
Brands Using Deforestation Palm Oil
These brands have products that contain palm oil sourced from mills that are responsible for the destruction of precious habitats of endangered species. Just in 2020 alone, these brands (along with…Palm Oil Detectives
This is interesting. In my blogposts analyzing ATproto I had compared the shared heap vs message passing from a CS perspective
dustycloud.org/blog/how-decent…
dustycloud.org/blog/re-re-blue…
Ian Preston of Peergos did the actual formal mathematical proof of the incentive structure: peergos.net/secret/z59vuwzfFDp…
> It is interesting that this is independent of N. Let's say you have 1000 servers, and 1000 followers per user. Then the shared heap model uses about the same network bandwidth. With a small number of servers SH can be better, with many servers AP is better.
> The conclusion is that the shared-heap model builds in a structural incentive to keep M small, and thus has a natural centralizing force. Conversely there is an incentive in AP to keep F small.
Ie, there is a mathematical incentive in ATproto to only have a few large players.
RMRSavage
in reply to Palm Oil Detectives • • •