Skip to main content


The impossible paradox of car ownership. "Cars are harmful to the environment, expensive, and loaded with negative externalities. But the individual benefits to low-income people are too great to ignore." https://www.vox.com/23753949/cars-cost-ownership-economy-repossession
in reply to kottke.org

in some sense, car ownership is a tax on those people due to the killing of public infrastructure.
in reply to kottke.org

car ownership is already *heavily* subsidized. Yet still out of reach for many people, as the author illustrates. The author also doesn't acknowledge that many people will never own and drive a private vehicle, even if it were free.

Given all this, maybe more subsidies for driving isn't the solution?

"The share of this cost [car ownership] is born by society is 41%"

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800921003943?via%3Dihub

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.