I feel like uspol is a useless term tho. It isn't really specific enough to explain why one wouldn't want to read the post or the article. If it were up to me I'd have it say something like "shitty newspaper article, [insert name of more specific bigotry such as transphobia or racism here]". This way, it communicates more helpful information to someone reading the content warning.
ch0ccyra1n :she_her::neocat_floof_cute:
in reply to :thufie: דגל שכור 🏴 :contains_thc: • • •Content warning: cw meta
Noctifer Shade
in reply to ch0ccyra1n :she_her::neocat_floof_cute: • • •Content warning: cw meta
ch0ccyra1n :she_her::neocat_floof_cute:
in reply to Noctifer Shade • • •Content warning: cw meta
Could always put that in the cw I guess? 🤔
What I'm getting at is that specificity matters in cws
Noctifer Shade
in reply to ch0ccyra1n :she_her::neocat_floof_cute: • • •Content warning: cw meta
“CW, not relevant for fake countries”
ch0ccyra1n :she_her::neocat_floof_cute:
in reply to Noctifer Shade • • •Content warning: cw meta
Oh jeez lmao
I meant well, that it's about a school shooting. It would help for those who well, don't want to hear about those which includes myself as-well.
"cw school shooting" or something to that effect.
Noctifer Shade
in reply to ch0ccyra1n :she_her::neocat_floof_cute: • • •Content warning: cw meta
i mean, you can just add “us” in there. i know it’s kind of redundant for school shootings but isn’t for transphobia, racism, etc
ch0ccyra1n :she_her::neocat_floof_cute:
in reply to Noctifer Shade • • •Content warning: cw meta
Yeah you're right. I guess my problem is moreso the "pol" or "politics" warnings are unhelpful. No issue with adding "us" in-general.