Skip to main content

PlayStation 1 emulator DuckStation changes license for no commercial use and no derivatives (it's no longer open source) https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/09/playstation-1-emulator-duckstation-changes-license-for-no-commercial-use-and-no-derivatives/

#Emulation #PlayStation

PlayStation 1 emulator DuckStation changes license for no commercial use and no derivatives

There's been a bit of a furore in the emulation community lately centred around the PlayStation 1 emulator DuckStation, which has now seen two license changes recently.
Liam Dawe (GamingOnLinux)
#emulation #playstation
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

Trey Fordham
Trey Fordham
• •
but the source is still there, the binaries are still available, and I could still build the package from source for myself, right? right???
in reply to Patryk

Trey Fordham
Trey Fordham
• •
@pgronkievitz I'm reading the license on the Creative Commons website, but from my understanding (I am not a lawyer), merely building from source is not a derivative. Even then if I did modify the code I am restricted from distributing, which if I am only building it for personal use is completely fine. I believe I would have to be able to build and modify the code personally if I was going to contribute back to the upstream.
@Patryk
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

Bluesky: flaky.bsky.social
Bluesky: flaky.bsky.social
• •
eh, if this is what he has to do to prevent the emulator taking over his real life, so be it.
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

lime!
lime!
• •
i don't think they actually know how the gpl works, because i'm pretty sure you can't do that
in reply to lime!

Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮
Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮
• •
@lime if you have the agreement of contributors, you can do whatever you want, it's your project, but anyone can also fork from when it was gpl and continue it
@lime!
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

jeffeb3
jeffeb3
• •
This should restrict companies like Ubuntu or Red Hat from making it available in their repos, AFAIK. Bummer.
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

TruckStopSantaClaus
TruckStopSantaClaus
• •
I think it's kinda understandable when your free software, is being used for cheap retro devices for a quick buck. Still wish there was a better way to handle this.
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

tical
tical
• •
Dick move but its kinda understandable given that RetroArch essentially distributes his work w/o forking or contributing.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.

⇧