Skip to main content


PlayStation 1 emulator DuckStation changes license for no commercial use and no derivatives (it's no longer open source) https://www.gamingonlinux.com/2024/09/playstation-1-emulator-duckstation-changes-license-for-no-commercial-use-and-no-derivatives/

#Emulation #PlayStation

in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

but the source is still there, the binaries are still available, and I could still build the package from source for myself, right? right???
in reply to Patryk

@pgronkievitz I'm reading the license on the Creative Commons website, but from my understanding (I am not a lawyer), merely building from source is not a derivative. Even then if I did modify the code I am restricted from distributing, which if I am only building it for personal use is completely fine. I believe I would have to be able to build and modify the code personally if I was going to contribute back to the upstream.
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

eh, if this is what he has to do to prevent the emulator taking over his real life, so be it.
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

i don't think they actually know how the gpl works, because i'm pretty sure you can't do that
in reply to lime!

@lime if you have the agreement of contributors, you can do whatever you want, it's your project, but anyone can also fork from when it was gpl and continue it
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

This should restrict companies like Ubuntu or Red Hat from making it available in their repos, AFAIK. Bummer.
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

I think it's kinda understandable when your free software, is being used for cheap retro devices for a quick buck. Still wish there was a better way to handle this.
in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

Dick move but its kinda understandable given that RetroArch essentially distributes his work w/o forking or contributing.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.