ahh, I see. I havenβt touched blueksy because I want no more of Dorsey than Iβm forced to deal with. I didnβt know zinger culture was a part of the network.
@FreezePeach I figured Skunkable to be Facebook. Goebbler could be Parlor, Truth, 4chan, or any number of social media platforms. Influenzza is obviously Twitter. Happytime Funfeed I'm drawing a blank on. Maybe Instagram??
@JJ_Allen @FreezePeach They're more like elements of various networks. Goebbler was inspired by the direction Twitter is going, and Happytime Funfeed was derived from an Instagram/Threads exec's comments that discussion of politics would not be encouraged. Not that Meta is literally run by the world's worst authoritarians, though it's been known to help them out.
As I've been saying: social media platforms initially facilitated the breakup of society into tribal factions. Now, social media platforms *are* the tribes: which one you use declares which tribe you're in.
@mechadragon Influenzza was based on Instagram and what I've heard about Threads. Happytime Funfeed and Skunkible are more composites than exact matches to any one network.
I would perhaps change the first panel to read, "RW conspiracy theorists." Big corporations sometimes brand whistleblowers as conspiracy theorists and alarmists to discredit them. Just saying... Otherwise, spot on!
It's very refreshing to see a comparison between different social networks that doesn't force some kind of equivalence between a network run by fascists and a network where you have to put in some effort to curate your feed because there is no algorithm to do that for you
Those things are not as equal as some people seem to think
Influencer could be a good job, focused on *curating* (and I follow some few that actually do that). When did we take the wrong turn and made it all about brand deals and make-believe of seemingly perfect lives?
Big Mammoth seems like a contradiction in terms. How can it be algorithm free while only favouring those scientists and politicians who share the same opinion?
E. Hatt-Swank
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •π¨π¦
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to π¨π¦ • • •π¨π¦
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •John
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to John • • •John
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •JJ Allen π³οΈβπ
in reply to John • • •John
in reply to JJ Allen π³οΈβπ • • •JJ Allen π³οΈβπ
in reply to John • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to JJ Allen π³οΈβπ • • •Alberto β
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to Alberto β • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to John • • •Maxi 11x π
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •π£π π π½
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to π£π π π½ • • •Martin Hamilton
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •AnotherDayInHell
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to AnotherDayInHell • • •Brian Dear
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
Unknown parent • • •Friday
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •I figured goebbler was twitter, influenzza -> instagram, and happytime funfeed would be tiktok? (couldn't figure out skunkible)
idk about the authoritarian part, but I've always thought of tiktok as the most censored social media, although it's likely I'm behind
β
Jen Sorensen
in reply to Friday • • •DoomsdaysCW
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to DoomsdaysCW • • •tobadzistsini
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to tobadzistsini • • •Harriet
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •muz
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Lotographia
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •It's very refreshing to see a comparison between different social networks that doesn't force some kind of equivalence between a network run by fascists and a network where you have to put in some effort to curate your feed because there is no algorithm to do that for you
Those things are not as equal as some people seem to think
Jen Sorensen
in reply to Lotographia • • •Jen Sorensen
Unknown parent • • •Hoochie Daddy
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to Hoochie Daddy • • •πππππ
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to πππππ • • •Pterry
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Erik Uden π
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Nonce Olbrecht
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to Nonce Olbrecht • • •Wolf Munroe β
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Starraven
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •John Breen
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •xs4me2
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Hyphlosion
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Louis Couture π³οΈβπ
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to Louis Couture π³οΈβπ • • •Weltschmerz Γ Gogo
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to Weltschmerz Γ Gogo • • •Joe
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
Unknown parent • • •Merijn π¨βπ»
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Merijn π¨βπ»
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to Merijn π¨βπ» • • •BW Young Bo
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Scott π΄π·
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •civfanatics
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Rob M
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to Rob M • • •Jen Sorensen
TumblrRHYMR
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •your auntifa liza π΅π· π¦ π¦¦
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Fluffbell πͺΌ
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •I am sad about the influencer one
Influencer could be a good job, focused on *curating* (and I follow some few that actually do that).
When did we take the wrong turn and made it all about brand deals and make-believe of seemingly perfect lives?
Martin Nutty
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Martin Nutty
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Jen Sorensen
in reply to Martin Nutty • • •marrs
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •