no notes. It's my go-to daily driver as someone who has been dabbling in Linux for 20 years. It's as close to "it just works" as I've experienced with Linux.
I agree. As I said in another thread, in 9 out of 10 cases, Mint is the best bet. Stable, easy, zero non-sense. Another good contender could be Fedora KDE (assuming that the user comes from Windows), but it could need a little bit of work if you have an Nvidia card. If not, it's almost as easy as Mint.
Whenever I am loading a distro for newbies, I stick with PCLOS. Nothing bleeding age and everything just works. Bill Reynolds, Texstar, set up a tight admin ship over 20 years ago, and it still just works.
I would say yes in general, but I recently replaced Windows with Mint for someone who watches online videos on the TV via HDMI. There's no GUI way to have the content show at each screen's native resolution. Either one screen or the other has to have missing or warped content.
But where that's not one of the use cases, I would say yes, Mint.
Mint is certainly a good choice, especially the one based directly on Debian. But I think MX-Linux is a better choice. On the other hand, it's a good thing to recommand only one choice and make that the leading choice for beginners and people that want to abandon Windows. And then Mint may be the better choice.
Yes and no. It's one of the best, but the upgrade system is still too convoluted for a newbie. Also, people are recommanding Mx Linux?? You have to reinstall the whole thing at every upgrade, no?
my very first distro was Mint, retrospectively Debian is way better for beginners who actually want to learn about Linux, but if you're recommending an OS for gramps to browse facebook then Mint is the way.
DraSelXL
in reply to It's FOSS • • •J. R. DePriest :EA DATA. SF:
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Joel
in reply to It's FOSS • • •zane25
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Do you want things to simply work? Or are you looking to show how smart you are and can fix what wasn't broken.
Then yeah.
Carl von Lesquereux
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Fat_Farang
in reply to It's FOSS • • •�
in reply to It's FOSS • • •TheZorse
in reply to It's FOSS • • •I would say yes in general, but I recently replaced Windows with Mint for someone who watches online videos on the TV via HDMI. There's no GUI way to have the content show at each screen's native resolution. Either one screen or the other has to have missing or warped content.
But where that's not one of the use cases, I would say yes, Mint.
hadtobeonthejukebox
in reply to It's FOSS • • •el_haych2024
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Ange des ténèbres 🐈
in reply to It's FOSS • • •darkchips ofdoom
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Baharul Islam
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Bellaciao62
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Ronald 🇺🇦 🇪🇺
in reply to It's FOSS • • •On the other hand, it's a good thing to recommand only one choice and make that the leading choice for beginners and people that want to abandon Windows. And then Mint may be the better choice.
Gwên
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Javeen
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Libre>Gratis
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Daniel Sam
in reply to It's FOSS • • •Superboom
in reply to It's FOSS • • •