**Republicans Will Detonate Their Secret Weapon at the Midnight Hour to Stop Women from Voting **
Imagine arriving at your polling place in November only to be turned away because you changed your name when you got married. You’ve voted for 20 years with valid identification. Nothing matters. The SAVE Act passed the House in April, and 69 million American women are about to discover their names don’t match their birth certificates while the deadline to fix the problem has already closed...
Twenty years of voting with valid ID, Social Security records, tax returns, and a mortgage in your name mean nothing when the system decides your marriage certificate makes you unverifiable.
This scenario becomes reality for millions of American women if Republicans deploy the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility Act in the final weeks before the 2026 midterms.
Republicans Will Detonate Their Secret Weapon at the Midnight Hour to Stop Women from Voting
The Republican Senate will pass the SAVE Act at the midnight hour before the midterms, and tens of millions of women will discover their names don’t match their birth certificates when fixing the crisis has become impossible.W. A. Lawrence (Glass Empires By W. A. Lawrence)
like this
Brad Koehn ☑️
in reply to Muse • • •Muse likes this.
Joyce Donahue
in reply to Muse • • •Muse likes this.
Muse
in reply to Muse • • •like this
Andrew Pam and libramoon like this.
Amina Jojo
in reply to Muse • • •like this
Andrew Pam and Janet Logan 🏳️⚧️ like this.
stefani banerian
in reply to Amina Jojo • • •more ways to mess with voters and voting.
like this
tomgrzybow, Janet Logan 🏳️⚧️ and Lisa Stranger like this.
tomgrzybow
in reply to Muse • • •Janet Logan 🏳️⚧️ likes this.
libramoon
in reply to Muse • • •What every US citizen can simply do NOW
Laurie Corzett (Laurie’s Substack)like this
tomgrzybow and Andrew Pam like this.
tomgrzybow
in reply to Muse • • •Well, that's something.
;-\
Lisa Stranger
in reply to Muse • • •yes, BUT, will they require someone to actually be harmed first, as they typically do, to acquire the magical "standing" that is required to sue?
anyhow I'm hoping the elections officers will hold the line on this like they have been on turning over voter data—at a minimum, allowing the disenfranchised to vote on provisional ballots (which might even force the courts to deal with the issue sooner?)
like this
Muse and tomgrzybow like this.
tomgrzybow
in reply to Muse • • •Lisa Stranger likes this.
Michael Fenichel
in reply to Muse • • •like this
Andrew Pam, tomgrzybow, Muse and Lisa Stranger like this.
tomgrzybow
in reply to Muse • • •like this
Michael Fenichel and Lisa Stranger like this.