Skip to main content

A new blog-post: the two cultures of bioinformatics, and how academia selects against one https://philippbayer.github.io/blerg/posts/2023_07_02_the_two_cultures/

The two cultures of bioinformatics

i ramble about bioinformatics careers
Hello! Welcome!
in reply to Philipp Bayer

Ian Sudbery
Ian Sudbery
• •

As a fellow combiner (with a side order of tool bulding), I have to disagree. There is definitely a future in academia for combiner, they just won't be called "bioinformaticians", and rather will just be called "biologists".

Combiners absolutely can and should be leading research, as I do. Yes, I need some collaboration to generate data, but this is generally done as a quid pro quo for me supervising the analysis of their data.

in reply to Ian Sudbery

Frank Aylward
Frank Aylward
• •
@IanSudbery many good points all around. I think one way to succeed as a "combiner" is to focus more on the biological goal/question. I stopped identifying primarily as a bioinformatician because it felt like I was emphasizing the methods I use rather than the goal, per se.
@Ian Sudbery
in reply to Frank Aylward

Ian Sudbery
Ian Sudbery
• •

Yes, this is my approach in general. Unless I'm talking to people who do identify as bioinformaticians. As @gedankenstuecke said, a sort of code switching.

I think this points to a more general point that people who make their entire professional existance about a particular approach or technique are probably painting themselves into a corner that will hamstring their career. Whether this is bioinformatics, or something else.

@Bastian Greshake Tzovaras
This entry was edited (1 year ago)

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.

⇧