As much as I love my rolling release distro being Arch Linux I know that this kind of system is absolutely not for everyone and shouldn't be, so let's go ove...
Still funny that rolling release distros have been just as stable as the point ones for me. In the case of Ubuntu, the rolling release is WAY more stable (but it has been few years since I ran Ubuntu last).
I don't get the download speed limitation. I once had 5 Mbps downloads and the house ran with 2 Arch computers, and 1 on Void just fine.
In the worst case-scenario, you can just set updates to download overnight (at least on Void) and suspend the computer once they're finished, then install instantly the next day.
@malin You can make it work with a slower connection, it's just that you have to plan your day around when you're going to update. With something faster you can just get it done whenever you're free
user8e8f87e
in reply to Brodie Robertson • • •No, use @fedora instead and have the excitement of updating twice per year.
Packages there are almost as recent as on something (unstable) like Arch, btw.
olividir @linux
in reply to Brodie Robertson • • •Malinux
in reply to Brodie Robertson • • •I don't get the download speed limitation. I once had 5 Mbps downloads and the house ran with 2 Arch computers, and 1 on Void just fine.
In the worst case-scenario, you can just set updates to download overnight (at least on Void) and suspend the computer once they're finished, then install instantly the next day.
Brodie Robertson
in reply to Malinux • • •