Skip to main content


"Undiscovered bird extinctions obscure the true magnitude of human-driven extinction waves"
Cooke et al. 2023 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-023-43445-2

Meanwhile my neighbor, a cat owner, tells me that domestic cats "only" kill birds that are ill or weak in some way, therefore helping out wild populations stay healthy. The stench of wishful thinking can be felt from across town, cf.:

"The impact of free-ranging domestic cats on wildlife of the United States", Loss et al. 2013 https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms2380%C2%A0

Don't be mislead by the statement: "Un-owned cats, as opposed to owned pets, cause the majority of this mortality", because "we define un-owned cats to include farm/barn cats, strays that are fed by humans but not granted access to habitations, cats in subsidized colonies and cats that are completely feral".

#EcosystemCollapse

in reply to Albert Cardona

There are newspaper articles about these studies:

"Human-driven extinction of bird species twice as high as thought, study says" https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/19/human-driven-extincition-of-bird-species-twice-as-high-as-thought-study-says-aoe

"Killer kitties: cats are eating 2,000 species, including hundreds that are at risk" https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2023/dec/12/cats-diet-2000-species-conservation-study-aoe

#CatsOfMastodon

in reply to Albert Cardona

And excellent follow up paper (by the same authors as the Nature Communications one) dealing with "arguments" against their first paper, which everyone should have in their back pocket: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10530-018-1796-y

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.