Donald Trump just blew up trade policy -- and handed himself new, unchecked power in the process.
With the stroke of a pen, he declared a fake “national emergency,” slapped devastating tariffs on nearly every US trading partner, and tanked the economy. Prices are spiking. Supply chains are seizing up. And Trump is doing it all on purpose -- to reward his loyalists, punish his enemies, and tighten his grip on power.
This is happening, in part, because Trump has a 2nd grade comprehension of international trade. But the real motivation isn’t trade. It’s control. (ICYMI, Senator Chris Murphy broke this down in a must-read Bluesky thread.)
These tariffs are designed to inflict pain -- on consumers, on businesses, on entire communities -- so that Trump can dole out relief in exchange for obedience. He’s creating a crisis that only he can “solve,” and he’s holding the economy hostage to get what he wants.
Now, Congress has a choice. And whether they act -- or cave -- depends on how much heat they’re feeling from the public.
Enter: The Privileged Resolution
Under the National Emergencies Act, Congress has a powerful tool to fight back against the Trump tariffs. They can fast-track a vote in both chambers on a privileged resolution to terminate Trump’s fake emergency and block the tariffs.
✅ These resolutions can’t be buried in committee
✅ They can’t be filibustered in the Senate
✅ They force a vote -- putting every single Member of Congress on the record
Democrats are already moving. Senator Ron Wyden is leading in the Senate. Rep. Greg Meeks is leading in the House. This is real momentum -- but we need to make it impossible to ignore.
The Trump Veto and Why It’s Important to Force the Votes Anyway
Trump has already said he’ll veto the resolution. That’s not an excuse to back down. It’s a reason to fight harder. Congress must move forward, regardless of the veto threat. Here’s why:
Even if the resolution doesn’t become law, the fight matters. It puts every Member of Congress on the record. It creates headlines and builds public pressure. It slows Trump down and exposes the authoritarian game he’s playing. And it shows the country that Democrats will not go quietly while he abuses power.
This isn’t just a symbolic vote. It’s a test. And we need to make sure every Democrat passes it -- and every Republican is forced to own their complicity.
Now, we know this is a lot about process. But there’s one more thing you need to know:
Republicans might change the rules so that we can't fast track this resolution -- thereby burying it. They've done this before, and are already trying to do it again. But if they succeed, we've got a back up plan: The discharge petition. If 218 House members sign on, they can force a vote to the floor -- no matter what Mike Johnson says.
From the Indivisible mailing list
like this
Ivy Blackledge Whitfield 2025, Jay Bryant, Andrew Pam, Yani, Isaac Kuo and Greg A. Woods like this.
Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.
Jay Bryant
in reply to Muse • • •like this
Muse and Ivy Blackledge Whitfield 2025 like this.
Karl Auerbach
in reply to Muse • • •I wrote this over on my sfba.social Mastodon account:
There have been several postings recently regarding the power of Congress to revoke the tariff powers FFOTUS has been using to cause chaos.
In the recent SCOTUS case of Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo the court said (in a nutshell) that Congress may not delegate legislative authority to administrative (executive branch) agencies. SCOTUS said that Congress must, itself, make those legislative choices. #CHEVRONDEFERENCE
Well, FFOTUS' mad tariff games are exactly that kind of legislative power that Congress has, over the years, handed over to the executive branch.
So why is the Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo not being raised to argue that those delegations by Congress to the executive over national emergencies and tariffs are improper and that those decisions may not be made by the executive and must be made only by Congress?
like this
Brian Fitzgerald, Will, Muse and Jay Bryant like this.
Muse
in reply to Muse • • •@Karl Auerbach I know. It astounds me how so many people are just rolling over to whatever 47th says.
He is using simple bully logic. Of course! He's an idiot, but he knows what works. Find the weak and isolated kids. Beat them up. Scare all the other kids. The other kids will either become part of his entourage, or in fear does what he says. No one wants to become the next kid he beats up.
Jay Bryant likes this.
Richard
in reply to Muse • • •like this
Muse and Ivy Blackledge Whitfield 2025 like this.
Richard
in reply to Muse • • •Muse
in reply to Muse • • •@Richard You may have heard the adage, and its retort:
"The means justify the ends"
"The means ARE the ends."
We need people doing what they can within a democratic framework. That way when we pick up the pieces, we won't have to be making everything up from scratch. That would take a long time.
Some of our political system is corrupt. Some of it sabotages itself. We need to do what we can to weed these things out.
We most especially need to ensure we are not working under a double system of oligarchy and democracy. Oligarchy is currently winning. It does not help to replace it with a different form of hierarchy. Might cannot make right. Only real justice can do that. A real democracy can ensure that happens. Please, don't lose faith.
Richard likes this.
Richard
in reply to Muse • • •Ivy Blackledge Whitfield 2025 likes this.
Richard
in reply to Muse • • •Ivy Blackledge Whitfield 2025 likes this.
Richard
in reply to Muse • • •like this
Muse and Ivy Blackledge Whitfield 2025 like this.
Muse
in reply to Muse • • •❤
Ivy Blackledge Whitfield 2025 likes this.