A minor typo clarification in
@nextcloud's post (which I otherwise agree with). I'm not the sole author of any version of #AGPL. I invented the method that makes the Affero clause work¹, and I helped codraft #AGPLv3§13.
License drafting has many contributors; no one is the sole "author".
¹ I invented the approach of an additional requirement when modifying the software that the complete, Corresponding Source be made available to all who had access to the running software.
@fuchsiii OFC not - and not because they don't want to [tho I'd also nope ransomware groups' demands] but also because #nvidia can't legally do that in many cases, as they too are #licensees of #patents and are bound to #NDA's.
So #GPLv3 and #AGPLv3 are impossible to comply with and even #GPLv2 would be hard to.
Kinda like the shitshow #BusyBox did (gojng GPLv3 and sueing the crap out of license violators), so @landley left that project and started #toybox from the ground up.
