Skip to main content

"The machine also dealt with its human interlocutors in polite and empathetic terms, in contrast to the scorn sometimes heaped on conspiracy theorists in real life."

Fascinating (but pay-walled) article on how chat #AI can influence people away from conspiracy beliefs. Humans are messy and subjective. Is an opaque summary machine more reliable and more engaging when it comes to discerning truths?

https://www.ft.com/content/909f33d1-0d33-440b-a935-cfa65d2fccd1?segmentId=b0d7e653-3467-12ab-c0f0-77e4424cdb4c

Subscribe to read

Financial Times
#AI
in reply to scribe

Fionnáin
Fionnáin
• •
interesting idea. Like an automatic tl;dr that just says 'article makes unreliable claim that aliens have replaced humans' or something. It would be nice if there was some potential in this.
in reply to Fionnáin

scribe
scribe
• •
@ephemeral Yeah, it could be cool to have an option like "click here to discuss these topics further" in an interactive way!
@Fionnáin

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.

⇧