I'll follow with great interest Mozilla's moderation policy for its Mastodon instance. This won't be easy; there will be disagreements; there isn't a textbook for determining disinformation. But as @alex said on TWiT, what you buy into in a social network is its moderation.
cc: @leo
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/social-content-policies/
cc: @leo
https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/social-content-policies/
william.maggos
in reply to Jeff Jarvis • • •@tchambers
I understand preventing harassment and dealing with content that's illegal, but the #fediverse is part of the #openweb. should we also be policing the truth of what people put up on their own websites? Instances must have their own standards but a social web where it's hard to post unpopular perspectives and have the potential to reach a wide audience (via strict content policing and fediblocks) will be very bad for democracy.