Skip to main content

in reply to It's FOSS

We have many many times your followers, often have posts massively shared, and never encountered a problem with it.

What are you server specs?

in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux ๐Ÿง๐ŸŽฎ

@gamingonlinux on the news website, we have a 2 CPU, 2 GB RAM server. On the main itsfoss website, we have 4 CPU, 8 GB RAM server. Both are on Digital Ocean and we use Ghost CMS with Cloudflare for caching.
in reply to It's FOSS

so youโ€™re using their pretty small cloud VPS then, that on top of how ridiculously heavy your site is (which others have pointed out) is not helping
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to It's FOSS

We need to talk about your site endlessly loading data (it's currently at 198mb) for ads and god knows what else
in reply to It's FOSS

Yes, it is a problem for the page of @Teri_Kanefield as well. It's hard to handle for anyone who wants to just host a website and posts links on Mastodon.
in reply to It's FOSS

I saw the headline and was prepared for some kind of entitled or otherwise stupid thing, but when I read what his reason was, I immediately became a convert. I understand his problem.

If main Mastodon doesn't fix this soon, maybe the upcoming hard fork can prioritize it? @are0h

in reply to It's FOSS

it sounds more like the site's issue for not being able to handle ~100 requests per second
in reply to It's FOSS

What you need is server side caching: nginx.com/blog/benefits-of-micโ€ฆ
I was involved once in hosting a Ghost blog and it was a must.
in reply to It's FOSS

I see a strong irony in a publication thatโ€™s literally all about FOSS saying *someone else* should fix this problem. If you want to see something fixed in a community-powered, open source project, why not roll up your sleeves and get to work on it?
in reply to Graham Lea

@evolvable, why do you think an end user of an open source project should also be capable of fixing issues in the project's codebase?

By this logic, only developers should use an open source project or they should keep their mouths shut about the issues they encounter.

in reply to It's FOSS

Thatโ€™s not what I was saying. Just thought an article thatโ€™s essentially asking โ€œWhy hasnโ€™t this community of non-profit employees and volunteers fixed the thing that I think is most important in this software Iโ€™m not paying for?โ€ was pretty odd, especially from an outlet familiar with the trade-offs of FOSS.
in reply to It's FOSS

I feel that boosting this is like when someone reply to all, to say that you should not reply to all.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to It's FOSS

Your page loads 6MB of data with uBlock Origin, 55MB without it and never stops piling on more and more. Seems to load some Google Ads garbage over and over again?

In the time between the first sentence and now, it loaded 30MB more data. Please fix your site.

in reply to It's FOSS

If this were true, why are you yourself sharing it on Mastodon?

This is highly inaccurate misinformation, and I'm assuming the people whom work there know enough about computers to know this.

Please issue a correction and an apology.

in reply to johnteachestech

@johnteachestech This is not an inaccurate misinformation.

You can check for yourself: aumetra.xyz/posts/the-fedi-ddoโ€ฆ

jwz.org/blog/2022/11/mastodon-โ€ฆ

github.com/simonw/simonwillisoโ€ฆ

mstdn.social/@stux/11234618886โ€ฆ

in reply to It's FOSS

Ok maybe its not misinformation that its a ddos threat for YOUR current servers, but to imply that it's a Mastodon issue and not an Its FOSS issue, is misleading and inaccurate.

A single website visitor from twitter could ddos a server if its weak enough, but Mastodon itself is even run on home lab servers.

If you want to republish the article as 'It's FOSS isn't willing to put a very small amount of effort into scaling to support FOSS social media users' then it would be accurate.

Look, It's FOSS is a great publication and people like it, myself included. Don't let one bad article tarnish the reputation.

in reply to It's FOSS

It's quite telling that there are several comments telling you how you could be handling this on your side. There is clearly an issue on the Mastodon side, but you are not powerless either and can configure things differently on your end to better manage the situation. I'm guessing you didn't realise that was the case. Also, it seems unlikely that Mastodon traffic is going to be enough to defeat Cloudflare CDN.
in reply to It's FOSS

๐Ÿค” ein wirklich interessanter und wichtiger Aspekt, den ich hier auch nicht kleinreden will. Aber der Lรถsungsansatz, die User zu bitten, keine Links mehr zu verbreiten, ist sinnlos. Fรผr entsprechende Performance eines Servers oder einer Farm ist die Betreiberin verantwortlich: Caches, CDN etc.
in reply to XAG.info ๐Ÿ’ป๐Ÿ“ฑโš™๏ธ๐Ÿ–ฅ

@XAGinfo Not sharing our links is more of an expression than a literal meaning.

Can we stop people from sharing links, no, right? We don't have that power.

- Ankush

in reply to It's FOSS

If you don't want to get this traffic, stop offering up public link previews. You are the ones choosing to provide that metadata.

Someone has to pay for the bandwidth spent on distributing your link previews. You're the ones who monetise from clicks to your website- why don't you pay for it by getting better hosts?

But no, you write this rent-seeking post insisting that Mastodon instances (many of whom do this for free) should let you freeload your rich presence traffic. Shameful.

in reply to It's FOSS

in reply to It's FOSS

I've noticed that when sharing links to my own website, but I thought this was more of a me-problem with the sites performance.

Will be interesting to see how that'll pan out with the new site I'm currently buildingโ€ฆ :thaenkin:

in reply to It's FOSS

> a single roughly ~3KB POST to Mastodon caused servers to pull a bit of HTML andโ€ฆ fuck, an image. In total, 114.7 MB of data was requested from my site in just under five minutes - making for a traffic amplification of 36704:1.

Gorg, that's how URLs work

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.

โ‡ง