Skip to main content


This week's comic: "Polarization" is a reality-obscuring weasel word

#media #journalism #authoritarianism

This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Jen Sorensen

I'm reminded of an ancient Cosma Shalizi quote:
β€œβ€¦ our gracious host would really _like_ to be just a little bit to the left of a technocratic center, and to debate those just a little bit to his right about optimal policies within a shared objective function, and pretending that it is a technical and not a political discussion..."
in reply to Jen Sorensen

in physics, polarization of light means that you can only see a tiny sliver of reality.

Basically, polarisation looks like this youtu.be/aiMLJAZajxg

Keep up the great work 😎

in reply to Jen Sorensen

How are you, my friend? Could you share my latest post? Sharing is my source of income in Gaza.
in reply to Jen Sorensen

just because people use the word improperly doesn't mean the word should be canceled.

For example, a legitimate use: centralized social media polarizes as a byproduct of the incentives of platform owners.

True.

How it's used in the wrong contexts, though, is something that should be called out.

A simple question to ask the claimant is, "How?"

That generally stops them from abusing a useful word in future. πŸ™ƒ

in reply to Taran Rampersad

@knowprose It is true that social media companies thrive on conflict and tend to incentivize arguments. In this case, I am referring to the use of the word "polarization" among journalists and others to describe the political landscape in a safe way that avoids talking about what is actually happening.
in reply to Jen Sorensen

Agreed. And it makes the point that it's not just social media, either. It's media.

Which is also a fair point.

in reply to Jen Sorensen

I think this is somehow missing the point. The root of the problem is the first past the post voting system which leaves voters in practical terms with a binary choice between two parties. That is polarisation. That is black or white; right or left; billionaires or poverty - it is not a real reflection of life or politics and the only solution is to adopt proportional representation.
That produces a range of political parties reflecting the range of political views.
in reply to Jen Sorensen

I believe that there are inherent rights of people, and that those rights are nonnegotiable. They should be defended at all costs, even with violence if need be.
in reply to Jen Sorensen

The late civil rights activist Israel Shahak would say "There are encouraging signs of polarization." It is the process of polarization that affects change.
in reply to Jen Sorensen

In fairness… it’s probably what Rupert Murdoch corporations have done for decades.
in reply to Jen Sorensen

Polarization : 2020's :: Class warfare : 1990's

And 60% of America has no fucking clue what any of the above means or how to read it.

in reply to Jen Sorensen

This certainly explains the alarm bells that go off in my head when I hear people say it.
in reply to Jen Sorensen

Funny how the accommodation in goes only in one direction
This entry was edited (3 weeks ago)
in reply to Jen Sorensen

fascism relies on people submitting before they're even asked to
in reply to Jen Sorensen

completely disagree. Used polarisation precisely because it’s extremism becoming evident at both ends of the spectrum and mastodons might like to think on that.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.

⇧