I'm reminded of an ancient Cosma Shalizi quote: ββ¦ our gracious host would really _like_ to be just a little bit to the left of a technocratic center, and to debate those just a little bit to his right about optimal policies within a shared objective function, and pretending that it is a technical and not a political discussion..."
@knowprose It is true that social media companies thrive on conflict and tend to incentivize arguments. In this case, I am referring to the use of the word "polarization" among journalists and others to describe the political landscape in a safe way that avoids talking about what is actually happening.
I think this is somehow missing the point. The root of the problem is the first past the post voting system which leaves voters in practical terms with a binary choice between two parties. That is polarisation. That is black or white; right or left; billionaires or poverty - it is not a real reflection of life or politics and the only solution is to adopt proportional representation. That produces a range of political parties reflecting the range of political views.
I believe that there are inherent rights of people, and that those rights are nonnegotiable. They should be defended at all costs, even with violence if need be.
The late civil rights activist Israel Shahak would say "There are encouraging signs of polarization." It is the process of polarization that affects change.
completely disagree. Used polarisation precisely because itβs extremism becoming evident at both ends of the spectrum and mastodons might like to think on that.
Miles Offit... π¨π¦πͺπΊπΊπ¦
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Afternoon T
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •ββ¦ our gracious host would really _like_ to be just a little bit to the left of a technocratic center, and to debate those just a little bit to his right about optimal policies within a shared objective function, and pretending that it is a technical and not a political discussion..."
Harald Werner
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •craignicol
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •in physics, polarization of light means that you can only see a tiny sliver of reality.
Basically, polarisation looks like this youtu.be/aiMLJAZajxg
Keep up the great work π
- YouTube
youtu.beT. Mohammad from Gaza
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Taran Rampersad
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •just because people use the word improperly doesn't mean the word should be canceled.
For example, a legitimate use: centralized social media polarizes as a byproduct of the incentives of platform owners.
True.
How it's used in the wrong contexts, though, is something that should be called out.
A simple question to ask the claimant is, "How?"
That generally stops them from abusing a useful word in future. π
Jen Sorensen
in reply to Taran Rampersad • • •Taran Rampersad
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Agreed. And it makes the point that it's not just social media, either. It's media.
Which is also a fair point.
Faraiwe
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •117% that.
You never fail to deliver, and we love you for that, and more. Keep trucking!
Jen Sorensen
in reply to Faraiwe • • •Peter Brown
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •That produces a range of political parties reflecting the range of political views.
Remy Whisker
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Nantucket Lit
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •mossyrua
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •𦩠Plastic Garden Fauna π¦©
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Polarization : 2020's :: Class warfare : 1990's
And 60% of America has no fucking clue what any of the above means or how to read it.
troy_friz_zell
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •disorderlyf
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •GhostOnTheHalfShell
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Zach
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •kupac^ESC:wq
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •Lucy Weir
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •ShiroBloo
in reply to Jen Sorensen • • •