Skip to main content


The “Science News Cycle” by Jorge Cham is my favorite of his wonderful PHD Comics series. #science #news
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Step 2(media) is the absolute point of no return where anything resembling a scientific statement will become mangled beyond recognition
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

is there an English word for that thing in movies where a character starts out laughing and then suddenly it changes to crying?
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I love the whole series. It gave me very often something to laugh, something to relate to or the feeling of not being alone during my PhD time. We printed some of the most witty comics, cut them out and pinned them to our office door. They always made us feel better.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

the first error is to p. Formalized belief is much easier on the news cycle.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

All too true & funny!
Unfortunately, even some scientists conflate correlation with causation.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

a FYI: a paper with data set, on where most of the distortion occurs, and what: D Wright, J Pei, D Jurgens, I Augenstein. Modeling Information Change in Science Communication with Semantically Matched Paraphrases. EMNLP’22 http://www.copenlu.com/publication/2022_emnlp_wright/. More in popsci article->tweet. The type of distortion: “Journalists tend to downplay the certainty and strength of findings from abstracts” and “limitations are more likely to be exaggerated and overstated”.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Haha! So great 🤗 I'm sending this to my sister. The Caltech queen will appreciate it.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.