Skip to main content


Yes, our phones are ‘listening’ to what we say.

“In Leak, Facebook Partner Brags About Listening to Your Phone’s Microphone to Serve Ads for Stuff You Mention”

https://futurism.com/the-byte/facebook-partner-phones-listening-microphone #tech #AI

#AI #tech

Eugen Rochko reshared this.

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

that explains a lot of things …the most awkward is that if you don’t allow micro to the app strange adv also appears …
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I feel vindicated by the fact I don't trust keeping any Meta apps on my main phone - I have a few of their apps on a burner phone with a dongle that cuts off microphone access, tape over the cameras, an empty address book and an empty camera roll.

I know I may seem crazy for this, but I don't trust Meta one bit

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

FWIW it’s not just Meta.

In Fall 2019, an employee from another prominent social media company told me this was common. /2

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

> Yes, our phones are ‘listening’ to what we say

Is anybody surprised by this? Genuine question. Is just seems self-evident to me.

Phones have mics. Those mics are controlled by the OS. Having it listen to those mics is legal. The OS on the vast majority of phones is made by one of the world's biggest DataFarmers. A big chunk of the remainder by another.

I would be surprised to learn those companies were *not* listening on those mics, any time they can, and trying to monetise it.

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

not surprised at all by this. Have had a number of creepy random ads related to conversations earlier in the day. This is not "surprise and delight" it's "creep out and terrify"
This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

There isn't any oversight and the only real standards are opt-in.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Stupid question, why is your phone not degoogled yet, and why are using ad-based apps on it?

As the article mentions, at least in some jurisdictions, that's all at least partially legal by the users using these apps.

(Those won't fly probably in places that have limits on ToS being surprising, etc)

It's a bit like complaining that the party of face munching leopards is feasting on your faces after YOU ELECTED them to office. What did you expect? Them respecting your privacy?

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

This has been going on for years. My wife and I noticed it pre-pandemic, but that may have been via Google Home rather than the phones themselves.
@NuanceRhymesWithOrange
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I suppose texting just makes it easier.
Think I will have a lot of contrived conversations now about how I avoid palm oil in products, avoid companies that are anti-DEI, etc.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I wouldn't be surprised either if they were lying (or at least exaggerating) to attract customers
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Is there any evidence this is actually happening? This claim from CMG is a few years old, I think, but I haven't read anything to suggest it’s more than a scummy ad company making up shit to sell ads.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Google smart speakers also do this. I have twice had Google services present me with information for things that were talked about in front of the speaker but never searched for, in one case by someone else without my phone present. Google denied it, even after I sicced the UK Information Commissioner on them, but it's the only possible explanation.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

the article is unfortunately very lacking in sufficient detail on which phone platforms this is on and if it somehow bypasses the indicator that the mic is on or if the indicator is on and users just aren't aware they opted in.

Otherwise it just leads to continued conspiracy theories about phones magically listening.

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Has anyone actually done a search of terms of service for the permission they name? Just because they're advertising this as possible doesn't mean their implementation is actually widespread. Certainly, given that both phone platforms now have non-overidable indicators of microphone activity, one would expect it to attract some attention — unless they're claiming a fundamental beach of OS protections, which is a rather bigger deal.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

other than marketing slideware, i've not seen any actual evidence for this anywhere yet. Has anyone else?
This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I thought we knew this?

I mean I was feeling it in 2016 as my last post on Facebook testifies

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

the leaked doc just says "smart devices" not "cell phones"

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/25051283-cmg-pitch-deck-on-voice-data-advertising-active-listening?ref=404media.co

More to the point, modern Apple devices cannot do this. when the mic is active, there is an explicit indicator when the mic is listening, which is a security feature (requiring explicit opt-in permission) that operates at a firmware level

can this malicious behavior work on shitty Androids? maybe. but then it's irresponsible for YOU to say "our phones"

This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

how about we cool our jets until security researchers show evidence that it happened at all?
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

That headline is a disgrace and the rest of the article is a complete nothing burger. This idea has been around for ages, and yet no one has found any proof that this thing - that would very clearly show up on your phone's logs, permissions, network, and battery usage - is actually happening. Shameful.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I knew this was coming, after listening to several "cybersecurity experts" chastise people for thinking this was possible... I wonder if they are going to delete those tiktoks now
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

That's why I regularly check that all of my microphone permissions are locked down.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

The article very much reads like 404Media trying to sell their subscriptions..
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

There‘s a reason app permissions exist, such as using the microphone.

iOS will show an orange dot at the top of the screen whenever it‘s being used by an app. To find out which app, open the top drawer and tap on the now-orange time in the top left corner.

On macOS it works similar. I don’t know, can only guess many Android phones will do the same.

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

It's uncanny how blatant it is. We mention something, and minutes later the ads are different.
SciFi dystopia motif.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Content warning: Me cussing uncontrollably in response

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

except it's not actually true and the only sourcing is a sketchy fly by night company's self-interested marketing claims
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

What’s the deal with 404 Media? Reporting that an advertising company claimed to be listening to conversations for targeting is legitimate. They did make that claim. Repeating the claims without pointing out that they are given no credence by technical experts is irresponsible at best.
This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Maybe, but the original 404 reporting doesn't contain any information about what kind of device the voice data is collected with. Might also be TVs or other spy appliances.
This entry was edited (2 months ago)
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Won't stop Corporate from gaslighting everyone on the matter.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

@CEvaN Yep. My family members have frequently noticed this type of activity: verbally mention a product, then suddenly that product appears in your feed.

Everybody should try that as an experiment. It's unsettling.

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Dude.. Im going to go through and start erasing apps... this is getting ridiculous
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

that's why I uninstalled FB from my phone since a lot. I discovered I had targeted ads related to my conversation.

Fuck FB!

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Coming from a science communicator with 62K fediverse followers, the absence of fact-checking and due diligence in your post is concerning!
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

@hacks4pancakes no they don't, which is why this article doesn't list any of the devices they supposedly "hacked”

it's just a bullshit marketing pitch — it's pretty sad that 404 is falling for this, their reporting is generally top notch

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

And this is why I don't use apps on my phone! Especially for Facebook and Twitter, they're data-scraping privacy-invading hellholes.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

@Gargron This article is based off of information that was originally making rounds in 2016. In 8 years since, there was never **any concrete evidence** showing that they can actually do this. None.

Considering that adtech is rife with fraud (to the tune of $billions swindled from advertisers annually), a more likely explanation is that this is just a bunch of grifters with a pitch deck looking to score off of gullible advertisers.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.