Firefox's move to support privacy-preserving ads backfired.
https://news.itsfoss.com/firefox-ppa-ad/
Firefox's New Controversial Feature: Is it a problem?
The feature may be a necessary evil, but what do you think?Sourav Rudra (It's FOSS News)
Firefox's move to support privacy-preserving ads backfired.
https://news.itsfoss.com/firefox-ppa-ad/
The feature may be a necessary evil, but what do you think?Sourav Rudra (It's FOSS News)
🏳️🌈 Vitalik 🏖️
in reply to It's FOSS • • •nickelson
in reply to It's FOSS • • •FOSStastic
in reply to It's FOSS • • •"The road to hell is paved with good intentions".
It reminds me a whole lot of Do Not Track, which also had good intentions, but ended up just introducing yet another vector to use for fingerprinting.
I also disagree with the claim that internet ads inherently require tracking.
No other form of advertising provides direct feedback about someone's interests or the products someone purchased after seeing or hearing an ad.
Advertising can be unidirectional, it doesn't need tracking.
sarcastictoast
in reply to It's FOSS • • •TheZorse
in reply to It's FOSS • • •I'm normally opposed to opt-out, and I hate ads. But I hate even more that ads are not ads, they're tracking devices.
I totally get that websites cost money, and those who make the sites and the content should be able to get paid, so if there's a privacy preserving way to serve ads, it's better to implement it than not to. And it's true that no one would opt in to this thing.
So I was thinking that, in my totally non-expert and unsolicited opinion, the best situation would be to make it opt out but PROMINENTLY show the user how to do so along with why they might consider giving the new way a chance.