I really don't understand AMD on this one. They already have linux versions of their drivers, going so far as to actively better their performance in linux in an open source way. So why exclude this? The biggest part of it is the AI model, something that shouldn't (to my knowledge) be difficult to port to Linux, so why not just port the interface to linux?
Heck, if they release a cli tool and properly document it, I'm sure the FOSS community will make GUIs on their own.
Random Tux User :fedora:
in reply to Brodie Robertson • • •I really don't understand AMD on this one. They already have linux versions of their drivers, going so far as to actively better their performance in linux in an open source way. So why exclude this? The biggest part of it is the AI model, something that shouldn't (to my knowledge) be difficult to port to Linux, so why not just port the interface to linux?
Heck, if they release a cli tool and properly document it, I'm sure the FOSS community will make GUIs on their own.
Kevin Karhan :verified:
in reply to Brodie Robertson • • •which is completely dumbfoundibg me because if anything #AI is predominantly developed, tested, trained ans run on #Linux...
And we're not talking about some #bloatware GUI App but basic #drivers.
@gpuopen , do something!