"If she says they're good, then I am ready to go."
Before his 1962 orbital flight, John Glenn was wary of trusting his life to a machine's trajectory calculations and asked that Katherine Johnson check them. #BHM
More on mathematician Katherine Johnson: https://go.nasa.gov/3Ef1sbX
#NASAhistory
Before his 1962 orbital flight, John Glenn was wary of trusting his life to a machine's trajectory calculations and asked that Katherine Johnson check them. #BHM
More on mathematician Katherine Johnson: https://go.nasa.gov/3Ef1sbX
#NASAhistory
Katherine Johnson
NASA.gov brings you the latest images, videos and news from America's space agency. Get the latest updates on NASA missions, watch NASA TV live, and learn about our quest to reveal the unknown and benefit all humankind.NASA
SpaceHistory, etc
in reply to NASA • • •Kevin Russell
in reply to NASA • • •And the crew wanted Kaherine Johnson to do it, because they trusted her mind.
Woozle Hypertwin
in reply to NASA • • •It was among the possessions I had which somehow didn't make it into storage when my parents moved out. -.-
Aswath Rao
in reply to NASA • • •Antony Johnston
in reply to NASA • • •https://social.beachcom.org/@nasa/109892242741564609
NASA (@nasa@social.beachcom.org)
Social::BeachVictor Tangent
in reply to NASA • • •Although dramatized for mass movie consumption, still a worthwhile watch.
silentw
in reply to NASA • • •It's an example we'd do well to follow as capital tries to push unblameable and inculpable systems into every facet of life.
✊🏾WiseGuyEddie
in reply to NASA • • •#blackmastodon #BlackHistory #BHM #BlackHistoryMonth
Robert Rodney Uplinger
in reply to NASA • • •Roller-skates, however, will be best applied [mostly] on regolith-free Earth.
'Truth.
riley
in reply to NASA • • •FirefighterGeek :masto:
in reply to NASA • • •https://social.beachcom.org/@nasa/109892242741564609
NASA (@nasa@social.beachcom.org)
Social::BeachGyzX
in reply to NASA • • •Carlos ☑️
in reply to NASA • • •Carlos 🌐 (@Com_cl@astrodon.social)
Astrodon - The Astro CommunityKalliope Konomos
in reply to NASA • • •