Skip to main content

Suggested change to the #uxn macros, some thoughts and ideas. It doesn't break compatibility and should make writing a few things a bit more fun.
https://lists.sr.ht/~rabbits/uxn/%3Ccf45df06-c866-4909-9a6d-aef54083f986@100r.co%3E

Uxntal Macros Preprocessor — sourcehut lists

lists.sr.ht
#uxn
in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

⛧ esoterik ⛧
⛧ esoterik ⛧
• •
I’m totally in favor of this backwards compatible change, especially if it means drifblim will get macro support!
in reply to Andy Alderwick

Devine Lu Linvega
Devine Lu Linvega
• •
It still works fine I think, but it doesn't pass the acid tests for scopes and lambdas, which are now pretty common, I don't have any recent code that doesn't have lambdas to test with.
This entry was edited (3 months ago)
in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

Per Vognsen
Per Vognsen
• •
Regarding the first proposed change, one nice thing about stream processing is that macro-defining macros are easily supported.
in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

WimⓂ️
WimⓂ️
• •
I'm in favour of this. I stopped using macros at your suggestion but I think they have their place, and the proposal sounds good to me.
in reply to WimⓂ️

Devine Lu Linvega
Devine Lu Linvega
• •
@wim_v12e I'm glad to hear! I've begun the work, I'll make another post when it's safe to use!
@WimⓂ️

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.

⇧