Skip to main content


Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

#uxn
in reply to ⛧ esoterik ⛧

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

#F0
in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to ⛧ esoterik ⛧

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to ⛧ esoterik ⛧

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to ⛧ esoterik ⛧

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

Content warning: uxn metadata proposal

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

@neauoire I'm afraid the JSR2k's and the final JSR2 won't call the routine with the same stack top:

* the JSR2 has “string*” on the top, while
* the JSR2k's have “string* routine*” on the top.
in reply to Andy Alderwick

@alderwick ah yes, it'd have to be ;about ;pstr STH2k JSR2 STH2kr JSR2 STH2kr JSR2 STH2r JSR2

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.