Skip to main content

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

"baroque chains of dependencies"

Was that added in the latest revision? I don't remember reading this in the draft. It's perfect. :eccehomo:

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

if it ain’t baroque, there’s re-naissance in fixing’ it
in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

The paper includes this pretty pattern from @viznut

@pixel ( x y -- )
ADDk STH SUB STHr AND #18 DIVk MUL SUB #09 GTH .Screen/pixel DEO
JMP2r

in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

I found this really interested, but the art historian/permaculture designer in me wept a little when the paper wasn't able to root it's definition of "limits" in specific art practice nor permaculture design itself. That seems like a really powerful next step, to me, because it helps the community step further away from retro-nostalgia, which can be a little tangled up with capitalism
in reply to eli_oat

@eli_oat I thought it made connections to Oulipo, and making furniture and architecture from recycled materials at one point? Do you have something else in mind?
in reply to eli_oat

@eli_oat Part 3 mentions Oulipo, free furniture, dub music recycling old radio equipment, etc.. But it's all mostly about salvage computing stuff, do you think this should address more permacomputing specifically instead?
Unknown parent

Devine Lu Linvega
@eli_oat So, for strange loop, I've pitched a talk about permacomputing, or more specifically, computing within limits, and so I'm very interested in going further then the paper, and exploring exactly what lies beyond the limit of hardware. Would you like to give me some suggestions on what you'd love for me to cover, and what you find could be interesting topics to intersect with permacomputing as a whole? If you've got the time. This morning I'm just writing down some notes.
Unknown parent

Devine Lu Linvega
@eli_oat Thanks a lot 😀 I think that with your help I can tie this in. Keep me posted.
in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

yes! I’m gonna have a think and follow up asap!

The big thing for me is that permaculture design isn’t an aesthetic endeavor — it’s a methodology for building a specific sort of system
which in turn has specific aesthetic consequences.

Unknown parent

mirth
@320x200 @eli_oat The part I struggle with is the most visible permacomputing projects all do a large amount of rebuilding the software stack from the ground up, often with similar constraints to 30-50 year old computing environments. As an artistic endeavor that is beautiful, but it doesn't seem to address the work and constraints many ordinary people have.
in reply to eli_oat

@eli_oat thanks for your feedback!
I think however, that you are misreading the paper. We specifically make a distinction between formal/traditional understanding of aesthetics and an approach to aesthetics that is more relational and that is essentially a system to sense and make sense of things from their production to the way they can be perceived, used, activated. This is derived from the notions of hyper-aesthetics and investigative aesthetics (Fuller + Weizman). We also explain several times that limits/constraints in this context are not about form or beauty or creative pursuit as an end, but we do warn that pmc and related practices are always at a risk to be misunderstood as such, or may eventually even fail to be more than various forms of aestheticization.

@neauoire

in reply to mirth

I think that struggle that you talk about is probably a failure of the permacomputing documentation to explain itself. The fact that others like you, by no fault of their own(it's just the times we're in), are shopping for a permacomputing app to buy, a permacomputing computer to get, is already a demonstration that somewhere things were miscommunicated.
This entry was edited (11 months ago)
in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

@mirth @320x200 @eli_oat There are attempts by people to draw a line at the edge of their computing needs and personalized system that they built to meet those needs, but these are by no means "permacomputing products". The permacomputing part is about finding these limits, not the artifact.
in reply to Devine Lu Linvega

@320x200 @eli_oat It's not so much that I'm shopping for a boxed solution as I'm trying to reconcile the work that I see with the present day use of computers as communication tools part of a larger network supporting people who live in families and communities. To satisfy uses like video calls with family, filling forms on local government web sites, e-mail with colleagues, etc, requires interoperating with the tools those other people use.
in reply to mirth

@mirth @320x200 @eli_oat Most of the modern day computer usage is not accessible to me at this time, so I cannot help you reconcile browsers, zoom calls and permacomputing, but I'm certain there's space to explore there for those who can. You might be interested in the work that Varia is doing.
https://varia.zone
in reply to mirth

@320x200 @eli_oat One of the big problems with most of these tools is the lack of control they bring. Do I really want Google Docs or Dropbox to hold all of my documents? Not really. There is a dearth of alternatives that are similarly robust to a lost or broken laptop, however, so I keep using them. Replacing these corporate-controlled services is my most pressing computing autonomy issue. Maybe this still fits under the umbrella?
in reply to mirth

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.

⇧