Stumbled upon @drewendy making me remember this gem of a #preprint It provoked me to think about how dual-use research of concern can be used oppressively. And challenges me to think about #synbio research that is also #frugalInnovation
Complete absence of thebaine biosynthesis under home-brew fermentation conditions
Yeast-based biosynthesis of medicinal compounds traditionally derived from plant materials is improving.bioRxiv
Danny (he/they)
Unknown parent • • •naturepoker
in reply to Danny (he/they) • • •naturepoker
in reply to naturepoker • • •Danny (he/they)
in reply to naturepoker • • •Danny (he/they)
in reply to naturepoker • • •@naturepoker
In any case, Mac doesn't seem active anymore last I corresponded with him was here:
github.com/DIYbiosphere/sphere…
I didn't push to continue migrating control of the site. sjamesparsonsjr and I can merge pulls into sphere and he has access to the gsuite. AFAIK there isn't (and maybe there never was) an explicit policy around what belongs on the site, and attention on it has dwindled
diybiosphere-tng · Issue #286 · DIYbiosphere/sphere
GitHubnaturepoker
in reply to Danny (he/they) • • •Danny (he/they)
in reply to naturepoker • • •@naturepoker When I asked for the ability to merge pulls it was because there were folks that wanted an updated directory of projects and things. But after much discussion I think there wasn't anybody who could lead/do the work to update it as an directory.
But I agree with you it's a marketing tool. I think that's why it was interesting to folks as a way to collaborate on marketing. I think it's become even more explicit because James was imagining a sort of newsletter being generated from it
naturepoker
in reply to naturepoker • • •Danny (he/they)
in reply to naturepoker • • •@naturepoker Yes I was not active in biology outside academic institutions/industry then.
Oh I did partially misunderstand what you were saying though. You're saying that folks were excluding academic people from "low-ranking" institutions. One story I listened to was of exclusion because they were from a "high-ranking" institution, a sorta you're not outsider enough sentiment. In any case, that exclusionary behaviour is no good. Enough problems trying to do science/maintain organizations.
naturepoker
in reply to Danny (he/they) • • •Hmm. I think there's a bit of a serious cultural difference at work here, between you and me that is.
The division in DIYBio was people with, say, B.S. from UC system (leadership of DIYBio) complaining that warehouse laborers and people with degrees from 2 year colleges are involved, acting like 'welfare queens' who 'coast on other people's work' and are generally too stupid and incompetent to know what they're doing - not paraphrasing. Real phrases thrown around in person.
naturepoker
in reply to naturepoker • • •Danny (he/they)
in reply to naturepoker • • •@naturepoker
Sounds horrible. And I am absolutely so interested and thankful right now that you're taking the time to share. I want to boost your last comment, but I want to get your consent first. No worries if you are not comfortable. If you're not comfortable then I'm also happy to switch to followers only as well (if you want mentioned only then let's just try and meetup in meatspace?) to continue the discussion. (1/3?)
Danny (he/they)
in reply to Danny (he/they) • • •@naturepoker
I'm almost not surprised that there were class issues at play in during the DIYbio.org era, mainly because of how much white tech culture underpins DIYbio (and still does underpin many elements of the community now). My understanding of the split between EJ and Genspace fuels a narrative where certain elements of radical social work (offering lab access for a low cost) clash with the values shared by a board with little accountability to it's membership. (2/3)
Danny (he/they)
in reply to Danny (he/they) • • •naturepoker
in reply to Danny (he/they) • • •Danny (he/they)
in reply to naturepoker • • •