Skip to main content


Populism coupled with increasing assaults on scientific integrity have dramatically shifted the political landscape & contributed to geopolitical instability.

The policy ramifications are yet to be understood, but anti-intellectualism has threatened public health, stymied environmental progress, influenced funding priorities & sculpted the rhetoric of local, state & national politics.

New post: The Rise of Anti-intellectualism https://sheril.substack.com/p/the-rise-of-anti-intellectualism #science #politics
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Yeah that is one of the first casualties of an authoritarian culture.

Authoritarians have always pushed for hatred of intellectuals, as an ignorant public is easier to control than an intelligent public.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Hopefully you'll soon be writing how the coalition government created when Democrats helped Republicans choose a sane Speaker, led to the isolation of the loudmouth self-destructive radical faction, and an attempt to resume functional government in the people's house.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I have seen this personally. It becomes easy to despair. Don’t.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

we see this in Europe too. It was disconsidered at first as a fad on social niches, but the pandemic was a turning point to this perception. It is understood now as an actual trend. A growing one.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

@pvonhellermannn Bruno Latour argues facts require values and exist in supportive networks of social interactions. You’re probably aware of this, but readers may find the following summary superb. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/magazine/bruno-latour-post-truth-philosopher-science.html
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Thia is sad and nothing new. When GWB was president, I often remarked to anyone who would listen that his being elected not once but twice was a testament to the failure of public education in America (not failure of teachers, but failure of a chronically underinvested system).
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Thank you for assessing this trend and how it affects national policies. Anti-science still surprise me. Rural America seems so dependent on scientific based innovations to live and work. Improvements in healthcare, worker safety and environmental health have improved the quality of life. Yet the politics of rural areas trends toward the GOP anti-science anti-government. I recall how Ronald Reagan tapped into this. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5922215/
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Very true in England. Poor education standards are a tool of the right so that they can govern by slogan. "Get Brexit Done". The response to #Covid has been dominated by a non-scientific approach, which is so tragic when we have outstanding Public Health professionals. Also the lack of a response to the #ClimateCrisis.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

"The ideal subject of totalitarian rule is...people for whom the distinction between fact and fiction (i.e., the reality of experience) and the distinction between true and false (i.e., the standards of thought) no longer exist."
- Hannah Arendt. The Origins of Totalitarianism. 1967

#Quote
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

@Sheril. It takes time 4 people significance of new scientific discoveries.
Take the example of Steam Engines. Initial loco steam carts were crude and noisy and appeared threatening to pedestrians and horse-driven carriages. Church also opposed it calling it Devil on the road. British Parliament had to pass Red Flag Act in 1865 requiring a man to walk 60 yards ahead the vehicle to warn others. Law was repealed in 1896!
In US a similar law was passed in State of Vermont in1894 repealed in 1896.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

agree it’s that and also the assault on data integrity and context underpinning all. Data is transformed from independent facts to political statements fueling very politicized views of science.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

We can thank Reagan for kicking off the dumbing down of America. For the last 4 decades they have been undermining public education bc they believe it "indoctrinates" children to be evil liberals, to the point where now the Supreme Court says "christian" schools must be given public funding. They truly want us to be Gilead. And a big part of achieving that is to keep the people stupid while telling them their opinions are as valid as any experts. https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/us-supreme-court-backs-public-money-religious-schools-maine-case-2022-06-21/
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

It isn't that policy ramifications are not understood, quite the contrary: they are obvious. Policy wonks, however, want nothing to do with dealing with the problem.

#headsinthesand
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Agree. And a large part of this problem is the general dumpster fire that is social media. 'They were so pre-occupied with whether they could, they never stopped to think whether they should!'

Putting all humans in touch with each other without meaningful oversight or guardrails is observably short-sighted. I believe this has contributed to millions of deaths + serious atrocities, up to & including genocide. Now with #musk , leaving #twitter is a no brainer.

https://robertsonp.substack.com/p/in-defense-of-the-twitter-quitter
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

populism will always appeal to the dumbest common denominators, magas, qanons, Christian nationalist, and their ilk
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Asimov saw it too, and he would grieve to see how such an incredible resource of information as the Internet would be purposely turned to pollute people's minds with distrust and deceit.

“There is a cult of ignorance in the United States, and there has always been. The strain of anti-intellectualism has been a constant thread winding its way through our political and cultural life, nurtured by the false notion that democracy means that 'my ignorance is just as good as your knowledge.'”
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

What do you mean by "assaults on scientific integrity"? I can think of a variety of possibilities, some of which I agree with, some of which I would consider the problem, themselves.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

What role does the ubiquitous use of lead up until the 1990's have to play in this. There was a measurable reduction in average IQ. I imagine that other mental functions might have been affected, too.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

The people get exactly the society that they deserve. If they allow leaders who are anti-intellectuals, whether in a democracy or under authoritarianism, then they have no one to blame. The people will either grab control of their own destiny, or they will suffer the consequences.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.