Skip to main content

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

the balloon is basically litter, unless they retrieve. The winnebago uses fuel. The balloon made from. Petrochemicals no doubt. The fabrication, pressurization and distribution of the SO2. Seems like this batched approach would on its own might be carbon positive.... negative credits.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

it’s the arrogance of these self important idiots that drives me mad. every single one of them is a perfect Dunning-kruger example. all self belief, not even the faintest sense that they might possibly have got it wrong
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Does it make any difference...?

I'm still holding the opinion that it's not the climate change that will end human (all) life on this planet.

On the other hand, I'm a misanthrope so keep on worrying about balloons and fuel consumption.

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Just what the world needs: Some dudes with a Winnebago, a tank of sulfur dioxide, and zero scientific credibility selling cooling credits
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

as the impacts of climate change get worse and worse expect a push towards more geoengineering. In the current tech bro move fast and break things culture that means more of this. Desperate people will happily pay for magic solutions. Imagine what someone could sell to Ron Desantis in Florida when the tide is rolling in?
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Well, you know, so very many tech bros. Always thinking they invented the wheel. But the wheel they announce is square-shaped.
This entry was edited (3 months ago)
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

SO2 has a short residence time compared to CO2. To sell this (very bad idea) as carbon credits they’d need a plan to keep injecting SO2 for a thousand years or so, not a timescale tech bros are good at, even when they try.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.