This accurately describes the MAGA ideology, from Kellyanne Conway's "Alternative Facts" to QAnon to The Big Lie. When they can't argue the facts, they attack the veracity of the data, and in some cases, even the very idea that something can be objectively known.
James Comer (R-KY) even went as far as to suggest that his opinion, his belief, should be considered equivalent to an objective, data-driven consensus, saying, "Who makes the decision as to who determines what's misinformation and what's not? One thing that you make think is disinformation I may believe is fact. Who's gonna decide?"
The attack on science, and even truth itself, is so dangerous.
my main rule is that if one lives in a world where subjective reality is strongly dissonant with objective reality, i need to give consent to enter that world.
i don’t like being pulled into hostile places.
but that’s just a bit of psychology mixed in with improv.
wesrolley
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •David Mankins
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Sane Thinker
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •🤖 The Droid Engineer (⊙﹏⊙)
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •James Comer (R-KY) even went as far as to suggest that his opinion, his belief, should be considered equivalent to an objective, data-driven consensus, saying, "Who makes the decision as to who determines what's misinformation and what's not? One thing that you make think is disinformation I may believe is fact. Who's gonna decide?"
The attack on science, and even truth itself, is so dangerous.
David Hopeward
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Florida Ted
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Sheril Kirshenbaum
in reply to Florida Ted • • •Unelected Representative
Unelected RepresentativeAphrodite ☑️ :boost_ok:
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •i don’t like being pulled into hostile places.
but that’s just a bit of psychology mixed in with improv.
Enoch
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •shyduroff
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •CherylBlueWave
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •