Skip to main content


What kind of biologist should you be?

I adore this charming - and pretty accurate - chart by @rosemarymosco to help make the decision.

Also, fungi wins 🍄 #art #science
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Too many interesting opportunities, too many decisions, ... 🥺
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Seems it's either birds or snakes for me. I do love both, so pretty accurate indeed.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

As someone who studied frog calls, they missed the shorter path of “Would you rather sleep all day and work at night” it might have led to bats as well.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

That sent me round in cricles! Conclusion: I want to I study ALL THE THINGS after 10 am (and at least one cup of coffee). 🤣 ☕ 🐸 🐠 🦔 🐦 🐍
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

🤣 I never thought I would see "Eh, needs more mucus" as a decision on a flowchart.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I am going to show this to my 8th grade daughter who has, out of nowhere, decided that fungi are immensely fascinating.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I have to add minor in chemistry or maybe a double major if someday you want more salary.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Hmm. There are other potential questions ...

My lad tried a project on tree frogs in a jungle, which involved amongst other things measuring the pH of the water pools in bromeliads at night (or some such). An easy peasy project to publish about, as there appeared, he thought, to be very little existing literature.

But it turned out that carrying a ladder (and a bunch of other kit) around a jungle at night by the light of a head torch is *hard* ... which is no doubt why nobody had done the work before. An interesting theory meets the hard reality of field work logistics. He switched to a different project.

So, there's still some "easy" research here that nobody has done. 🤣 🐸
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Now I know why I wound up at plants!

That and the fact they're easy to study as they wander very, very, very slowly. Easy to catch. 😄
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

This flowchart lead me to frogs, which is actually one of my favorite animals. Cool.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

It's great 👍🏻 but what about those of who studied large (not so fast moving) mammals? 🤔
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

My father was a microbiologist. I think he would have laughed at this.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I think it's funny humans aren't on here when there's still a bunch of stuff that we're like "we GUESS this is how it works but we can't prove it,,,yet" like how Tylenol/paracetamol actually works
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I got Moths.

I'd have preferred mammals, fish or reptiles.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

At one of my grad school interviews, one lovely women stated to me, dead serious, "yeast is the Rolls Royce of organisms."
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I work at a natural history museum and this has been hanging on my office door for years 😉
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I favor plants (especially trees) and fungi. Fungi growing on trees would be ideal.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.