Today is my dissertation proposal defense. That means I'll give a public lecture about my research in front of my committee.
As some folks may know, I'm doing another round of grad school, mid-career, focused on scientific decision making in the U.S. Congress https://sheril.substack.com/p/a-dissertation-on-democracy #science #politics
In terms of PhD-ing, this is kind of like the pregame. I passed my comprehensive exams last year & will officially defend my dissertation & finish this Fall. So here goes...
A Dissertation on Democracy
Consider this the Cliffs NotesSheril Kirshenbaum (Unelected Representative)
Kris Mitka :java: :rust:
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Raphael
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Charlotte Walker
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Long Tong
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Elle Plaster
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •michael fulgenzi
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •psefsu
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Random Seed
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Simon Harris
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •mary beth ☑️
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Sheril Kirshenbaum
in reply to mary beth ☑️ • • •@maryErudis Thanks! I’ve actually completed the research and composed 2 chapters already.
The first focuses on where senior congressional staffers turn for information related to science & who they trust most. The second is about barriers to participate in decision making more broadly & who isn’t represented in those roles.
I’ll be able to share more soon.
mary beth ☑️
in reply to mary beth ☑️ • • •Maine Lobster and Right Whales - Right Whales and Maine Lobster
Right Whales and Maine LobsterSheril Kirshenbaum
in reply to mary beth ☑️ • • •Lien Rag
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •In this case, you'll still get to be a Dr, but a special sort : a tl;Dr
Dr. M.B Muhammad
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Sudhir
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •peter honeyman
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Benton Greene
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •This sounds like really important work, and I'm glad to hear someone is looking at this from a scientific perspective. A lot of people, myself included, have a lot of opinions, with *wildly* varying basis in actual facts, about how congress makes scientific decisions, and I'd love to be much better informed than I am.
I know the proposal defense isn't *as* nerve-wracking as the actual defense, but good luck! I'm sure you'll kill it 😀
Alan
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Daniel M. Reck
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •You got this. Have fun today. Remember, you wouldn't be presenting if you hadn't shown yourself already well prepared.
Looking forward to your continuing contributions to the expansion of human knowledge. Welcome to the academy!
Paul van Gulick
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Scott Wright 🏳️🌈🏳️⚧️
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Daniele10
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Deb
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Ray Hayes
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •𝑪𝒐𝒓𝒆𝒚 𝑺𝒏𝒊𝒑𝒆𝒔 🌨️
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Jigeiko
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Bruce Acton
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •tiz
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Sheril Kirshenbaum
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •All done. And thanks so much for all of the very encouraging words this morning ⬆️
My favorite aspect of #Mastodon is that it’s generally such a kind & supportive community. /2
Jenny
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Jack
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Eugene Wallingford
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Das
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •👩🦯The Blind Fraggle
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Pete Zicato
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •