Skip to main content

in reply to It's FOSS

I used Debian for a while, but decided to switch b/c apt packages are a bit too outdated to me
in reply to It's FOSS

Mint and Zorin. Both are ok, but I will stay on Fedora.
in reply to It's FOSS

Fedora, for no apparent reason. Before that MX Linux, for plenty of reasons.
in reply to It's FOSS

Probably Puppy Linux. But that one was just an experience on a really old 32 bit laptop I wasn't really gonna use. I didn't even stop because of something bad about it, it was working fine. I just wanted to move on to another experiment, installing Debian without DE and playing with window managers.
in reply to It's FOSS

Hard question. In my learning path i have used fedora and debian, eventualy settled to ubuntu lts versions, because im lazy and do not want to update my OS from scrach evary month (extreme). Now days i'm reinstalling/upgraging how ever it goes with Ubuntu LTS. My learning process was using linux on secondary computer, because I do not like dual boot, I think "one OS for one computer", but that just me.
in reply to It's FOSS

void,it is very minimalistic but sometimes feels like there are missing packages in the repositories
in reply to It's FOSS

Ubuntu. But it really often freezes. I went to Nobara and everything is fine.
in reply to It's FOSS

Garuda. I wanted to use Hyprland, but it was better on CachyOS.
in reply to It's FOSS

kubuntu, a handful of features are broken by default
in reply to It's FOSS

I use arch right now. Previously I was on Debian but I didn't like the slow updates and the testing/unstable repositories would constantly break my system, and the nvidia driver caused problems.
in reply to It's FOSS

I reckon I've tried several. I reckon Linux Mint is a habit. Anything is better than Windows.
in reply to It's FOSS

NixOS — Too much of a hassle for too little of a benefit
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to It's FOSS

In 1994 I started with Slackware with kernel 1.1.13. After some time I switched to Debian and presently I am running Arch.

Arch so far is the finest rolling distribution and it is extremely easy to create packages with PKGBUILD.

For Clients who want to try Linux I put on Garuda which is a Arch variant that has many aur packages already compiled.

in reply to It's FOSS

Ubuntu, mainly because of Snap. But also because I prefer Vanilla Gnome over the Ubuntu variant. Now I use Debian for server and Fedora for desktop.
in reply to It's FOSS

I've used Pop!_OS for a long time, but I switched to Tumbleweed. However, I might go back when they are fully on Rust.
in reply to It's FOSS

CachyOS...terrible experience, definitely not for "just linux users".
in reply to It's FOSS

guix. I was never able to connect my phone through usb or set up mail as I wanted to.
in reply to It's FOSS

Zorin & Nobara. Both were missing tools that I've become accustomed to.
in reply to It's FOSS

Kubuntu. I wanted a more up to date kernel, and looking back at it, it was pretty unstable.
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to It's FOSS

Arch. Sigh. I have plenty of experience but for my home systems I wanted something that Just Worked. Been on Debian for 10+ years now.
in reply to It's FOSS

Mint didn't work well for me. Ubuntu wasn't coming back after hibernation, but for some reason Debian 12 works great.
in reply to It's FOSS

Artix. Tried it again to see how the systemd-free side is shaping up. Used the dinit init and service manager coupled with Hyprland and AGS.

Hyprland and dinit have made great improvements since I last tried them.

Still not my cup of tea though. Back on Arch now (Gnome this time), felt like coming home after a long journey 😂

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to It's FOSS

Ubuntu. At the time you had to futz with every upgrade to get multimedia stuff working. Mint came out, and all of that was ready to go so I switched. Still using Mint.
in reply to It's FOSS

Fedora. I just prefer Endeavour OS. Could never remember the command to update as I'm too engrained with PacMan.
in reply to It's FOSS

Ubuntu, when they changed the defalut desktop to Unity. Use Mint for jears now.
in reply to It's FOSS

elementary os : décevant, buggé, pas assez de fonctionnalités etc.
in reply to It's FOSS

Linux Mint - and not because of any deficiency on its part. LM is a really great X11 based distro. I wanted GNOME, and to sink my teeth into Wayland.

#GNOME #Fedora #LinuxMint

This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to It's FOSS

openSuse, it's pretty good but the it slowly started showing ugly things. Zypper is slow as hell. Not many guides/software target it. For some weird reason vscode wouldn't update even if the repos were set up correctly (i.e. according to the guide). Probably part of it was that I started with tumbleweed rather than with leap but still I find myself doing pretty good with kubuntu LTS. Although with the rust utils coming up and systemd being a thing I'd probably switch to devuan.
in reply to It's FOSS

Mint -> MX -> Debian.
Yes, i know, not very exiting, but i love stability :blobangel:
in reply to It's FOSS

Fedora 😎 Back to Linux Mint 😉
This entry was edited (3 days ago)
in reply to It's FOSS

Arch. Too much work to maintain and I don’t trust the AUR.
in reply to It's FOSS

RedHat .. I feel this is self explanatory.

Vector (Slackware), only because I don't need to operate in such tight restrictions anymore, but I would still recommend Slack to anyone who does.

OpenSuSE, which I absolutely loved for years, but even the text installer couldn't handle tight RAM restrictions.

Now running Debian based distros (Mint, Armbian, Debian itself) so everything stays compatible and follows the same workflow.

"It's a peaceful life."

in reply to It's FOSS

Mint. I found Cinnamon to be a bit too unstable, and when I tried @kde I was blown away by how much it feels like a “real” computer and not a dumbed down appliance.
@KDE
in reply to It's FOSS

I have to say traditional LTS distros. After doing big manual server upgrades for some decade, no more LTS expiration dread!

Next to go will be my arch desktop as I find #nixos fits my desktop and server needs way better.

A disclaimer would be that NixOS is non standard. Documentation is lacking and knowledge of the Nix language is required for advanced configuration.

in reply to It's FOSS

Nobara. I really appreciate everything GE has done for Linux gaming, but personally found Nobara to be a bit too bleeding edge, with updates regularly breaking my install. (At least in the timespan that I was trying it)
in reply to It's FOSS

A handful of the newest independent ones, because their package management is exclusively through terminal and I see graphic package managers as a human right.
in reply to It's FOSS

EndeavourOS, only because I had just moved apartments and felt like a change. I’ve got no complaints about EndeavourOS/Arch, I’m even getting a bit of an itch to switch to something arch based again (currently on Nobara)
in reply to It's FOSS

#Nobara Linux, a gaming-oriented variant of #Fedora. On Nobara it was much easier to play games (for some reason I have an aweful performance with flatpaks on Fedora), but it has so many small changes, which annoyed me.

It brings its own, crappy package manager frontend. It disabled SecureBoot support. All unnecessary changes for no reason. So unclean... And steam does not work unless I start it from a terminal emulator... 🫨

My new gaming PC now runs Fedora.

in reply to It's FOSS

NixOS. I liked the idea, but wasn't easier to use in practice.
in reply to It's FOSS

Mint

Used it from the get go with #cinnamon and #xfce until some day couldnt get my wireless to work.. so switched to #Manjaro and that was it. Stuck to cinnamon tho 🤗

in reply to It's FOSS

Ubuntu -> CentOS -> ALT. I'm not a very experienced Linux user, so every time I feel like my OS is "dirty" after my attempts to customize the system, I have to reinstall and try again... :linux:

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.