I discovered her work a couple years ago when I bought “if found please return to Elise Gravel” for my daughter. I love it and it’s been so inspirational and freeing for Fiona.
Very cool. Also, scientists will never tell you "This [whatever] is absolute truth" but rather "From what we know thus far..." such and such. Science is in continuous evolution the same way we never stop learning (if we try). No wonder fanatics hate it.
German cooking traditionally focuses a lot on boiling things in water. As a result, there's a German saying that goes something like "They just boil with water everywhere. " Applies to science, too.
Spoiler : everyone is curious too. But society thought it through. Most will wash houses all day or dig potatoes, and few will be awarded to not do any of that.
Curiosity and sense of wonder, that's what defines a scientist! PS: I particularly liked the fact that it is a boy the one asking for help with the math to a girl 😊
... but to be a scientist, you have to be WILLING to be wrong, ask for help, admit you don't know everything and that you aren't a genius. You also have to be willing to do the hard work of continuing through til the research is done, not just til you're satisfied or tired of it or got an answer you liked. Not everyone has those qualities or is willing to learn them. Not everyone is, or can be, a scientist.
yup. this is awesome. i was a scientist for more than 20 years, co-author on over 30 publications, published in places like Nat Comms and Cell. three first authorships, Participated on a submission in which a childhood disorder was named for the first time.
and was never able to get into grad school bc my baccalaureate grades were not good enough. (it's not only when we were 'young' ;)
Curiosity is a prerequisite, and I'd say that a large part of formal scientific training is knowing how to find out (how to choose reliable sources & conduct experiments) and have confidence in the answers you find (reproducibility, minimizing bias, etc).
This can set quite a dangerous president that would question scientists more often leading to people being more open to belief like flatearths. Remembering that becoming a scientist takes a lot of work to produce a work for science makes people strive to become better. Being contempt with oneself is surrendering and by attitude is the worst which can lead to suicide.
It’s actually a fascinating intersection between cultural representations of “scientists”, “geniuses”, social expectations and awareness vs self doubt in the context of fathoming oneself in either of the first two categories. No matter who the person is, science is always the first route if you’ve at all got enough awareness to value the growth of awareness in the first place. Unless someone is misrepresenting science, every other choice equals less self-awareness. 🌎❤️🦹♂️
Bryan Ruby 🌤️
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •LaPingvino 🟙 :ir:
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •FallsMom 🟦 🤖 🌻🌴🥥
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Kris Mitka :java: :rust:
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Killackey Illustration
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Steven Lawson Photography
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Imakethingsforu
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •kikebenlloch
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Raphael
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •オチュー🇵🇸
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Spoiler : everyone is curious too. But society thought it through. Most will wash houses all day or dig potatoes, and few will be awarded to not do any of that.
That's what we have grades and exams for.
Kathryn Deplume
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •bilbo_le_hobbit :bzh:
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Apuntes de ciencia
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •PS: I particularly liked the fact that it is a boy the one asking for help with the math to a girl 😊
genris
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Ray Of Sunlight
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Anne Ominous
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •yup. this is awesome. i was a scientist for more than 20 years, co-author on over 30 publications, published in places like Nat Comms and Cell. three first authorships, Participated on a submission in which a childhood disorder was named for the first time.
and was never able to get into grad school bc my baccalaureate grades were not good enough. (it's not only when we were 'young' ;)
Wigbert B 🎻🏛🎭🎤🗞🎥📚
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Mike Garrahan
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •neena maiya
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Brooklyn Ox
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Stargeezer Smith for Harris
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Alistair
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •William Gunn
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Skye
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •johnnysilverhand
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •martin
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Heart_Dominance
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •@elisegravel
It’s actually a fascinating intersection between cultural representations of “scientists”, “geniuses”, social expectations and awareness vs self doubt in the context of fathoming oneself in either of the first two categories. No matter who the person is, science is always the first route if you’ve at all got enough awareness to value the growth of awareness in the first place. Unless someone is misrepresenting science, every other choice equals less self-awareness. 🌎❤️🦹♂️
John
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •Josh Habka :verified:
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum • • •