Skip to main content


About 250M years ago, 90% of species on Earth died during the Permian extinction. All of that loss created a lot of vacant niches to fill.

And not long after, the first mammals, our ancestors, appeared.

I find it comforting to remember that life on this pale blue dot will be resilient - whether we’re part of it or not. #science #nature #history #SharedPlanet
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I think this is what many people forget - it's not the planet in peril it's civilization.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

We’re almost certain to be the first indigenous species on this planet to ever become aware of its turbulent history & our evolution, & also the first to understand how fragile our own actions have made our future.

And yet still too stupid to act on that knowledge, despite our endless hubris.

Very sad.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

hm, yes, but as someone who does value intelligence I think despite homo sapiens’ many flaws I’d like us to overcome those and succeed. There may not be enough time for a similar re-evolution. And if not for us, it would be such a waste of non-human life as well. I’m not that much of a nihilist
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Even more true of microbial life. Bacteria and fungi are still the dominant forms of life, eh?
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I would feel better with an asteroid defense system, personal escape starship and secondary safe location. And maybe with robots to bring me sammiches, ice cream, chocolate, candy, drinks and quality entertainment to my floaty couch. Occasional BBQ would be nice, too, but then I’d also want a moist towelette and maybe a nice bath after I poop.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I believe we're already in an "extinction event."

I imagine that in another 100 million years or so, whoever is the intelligent species at the top of the chain will probably refer to the current time as an "extinction event," too. We've lost a significant number of species over the last few centuries that will "disappear" in the future fossil record.

We'll probably be on that list, as well.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

"You can drive out nature with a pitchfork
But it always comes roaring back again"
Tom Waits - Misery is the River of the World

Nature will always prevail, with or without the human race.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

The Great Filter is a recently coined term but it is real nonetheless. I had hoped we could get through it but life will go on without us regardless. There is solace in that simple perspective for me.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I often say this to my kids when they tell me "the planet is dying". The planet, on its vast time scales, will recover. Some new life will evolve. Humanity, and many other existing species, may not be around to see it.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I feel the same way. The Ends of The World by Peter Brannen got me through the last 6 years. We are a blip in an interstitial, and by the end of the next era, there will be no sign we were ever here. I find that very comforting.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

of course it's possible that a new atmosphere will bring an opportunity for a new life but it's not a point. Humans are the only beings actively, consciously destroying other species, the planet and themselves - it's weird isn't it? Unless it's some emergency brake for evolution - something went wrong and must be stopped.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I think about this a lot. Environmentalism is about protecting the Earth FOR us. We'll be gone soon and life on Earth will go on, with humans being just a blink of its eye.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

"The planet isn't going anywhere. WE are! We're going away. Pack your shit, folks. We're going away. And we won't leave much of a trace, either. Maybe a little Styrofoam ... The planet'll be here and we'll be long gone. Just another failed mutation. Just another closed-end biological mistake. An evolutionary cul-de-sac. The planet'll shake us off like a bad case of fleas. The planet will be here for a long, long, LONG time after we're gone," --George Carlin

https://youtu.be/t-FN_jkF9qI
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Quite the early eulogy for humanity. Best to tread the tight rope of #GlobalWarming reporting:

“want to scare people enough to take the problem seriously but not so much as to make them feel hopeless [while] they want to reassure people that a climate-secure future is possible but only enough to avoid complacency.”

#ClimateChange #Extinction

https://correspondent.afp.com/watching-world-burn
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

is it because the dawn of new life will in some indirect way be resurrecting us?
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

agreed. We tend to think of ourselves as important. In the vast universe surely we are relevant? Perhaps not.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

There is a whole ecosystem based off methane emissions from volcanic sea floor vents and another vibrant ecosystem under Antarctic ice... Yeah, give it a little time and this place will be surging with life forms we can't begin to imagine. Could we imagine dinosaurs if there were no fossils? That's how wild the future will be on earth for billions more years, no matter what we do to ourselves.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

the earth will survive no matter what we do. Our survival as a species is still to be determined.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Amen.
I really can't wait for the human extinction to happen. Let mother nature retake the little planet and repurpose it!
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

two of my favorite sayings:
entropy rules
que sera sera

life finds a way despite human interference.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I hear you, but that’s a bit like taking comfort — while driving a school bus full of children into a wreck that will kill everyone on board — in knowing that many of these kids have siblings, so their families will go on. It is not okay. Sorry. #climatecrisis
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

this piece by @benwildflower touches on this feeling in a way I love.
“There was life before; there will be life after”
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

If you like rock. Life on earth is a tower of impossible height each part of the tower balnced delicately on the portion below, while maintaining stzbility to the parts above.

The Asteroid was a MUCH SMALLER problem than Venusification of earth.

Life is a million interactions interconnected to support the possibility of the complexity.

No evidence in all our years of searching for life, anywhere, becauae it is infinitly fragile.

Earth could EASILY become Venus. 500 degrees.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

So, I’m guessing you’re a “glass half-full” kinda person
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Until we agree on our universal "Purpose of Life" there can be no good or bad. Climate change, extinction, everything simply is.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

The dramatic climate changes that we have introduced are not recoverable. The previous extinction events were environmentally recoverable.

A model of overall warming trends continuing is Venus. How much life exists on Venus?
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

All Life will end though in 8 billion years when the Sun starts expanding. That isn't enough time for intelligent life to arise again. So we are probably Life on Earth's last chance to expand beyond this planet.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

All Life will end though I'm 8 billion years when the Sun starts expanding. That isn't enough time for intelligent life to arise again. So we are probably Life on Earth's last chance to expand beyond this planet.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

@madamscientist Not related to this post, but looks like in the field, ; so asking a q at the risk of revealing my non-existent knowledge in this field: there was a report of White-throated Sparrows having four sexes that only correct pairs can produce offsprings that can produce offsprings. Are we observing a subspecies being formed? TIA
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

We must not fall into thinking that humans will become extinct. For all our faults, humans are the pinnacle of evolution. Civilization, science, art, exploration and inevitable first contact with others like us must be in our future. Anything otherwise is tragedy of the highest form.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

If you accept the Gaia Principle, then Humankind are merely a parasite which has become a noticeable irritant and will be mitigated accordingly.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

your thinly disguised Fossil Fuel propaganda is cold comfort, thanks
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Agreed- beyond simply not consuming ourselves out of existence, there's also the question of just how much of the rest of the biosphere we're willing to tear down with us before we figure out how to live within our means.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I hope you're right. Life has survived past crises; but then, if it hadn't, we wouldn't be here to reflect on the fact.

There's no guarantee it will survive the crisis we're causing now.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

It is also estimated that a 5°C rise in average global temperatures will lead to the extinction of all vertebrate life on the planet. Every mammal, bird , fish and reptile. Which is much less than 90% of species but still gutwrenchingly scary. Life will endure, but not as we know it. And it will be another quarter of a billion years before anything close to us could evolve. The planet can maybe do this
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I'm watching Prime's The Rig and it's exploring this - in a scary, scifi kind of way.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

The wide range of responses to this post are quite something. Lots of different expectations about what’s to come on Earth.

I’ve been working on science & policy related to climate challenges in & out of academia for decades. For what it’s worth, I’m firmly on team hope. https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/no-climate-change-will-not-end-the-world-in-12-years/

We can address #climatechange. Many individuals, organizations & nations already are. There’s still time. Not much.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

An issue where the extremes are very loud, but most people see a need for REAL change.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I look at it as: The more we do and the sooner we do it, the better off we'll be. It's not a binary success or failure, it's a continuum that we can affect NOW.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

⬆️

The late, great #NobelPrize -winning chemist #GeorgeOlah was the Captain of ‘Team Hope’! We need more young chemists to follow in his footsteps!

“Chemical Eye 👁️ on Carbonated Air: From ‘Oh, Oh!’ to ‘O-la-lah’!” ⬇️

http://www.sitnews.us/MacDougall/042209_macdougall.html
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I am on Team Hope too. I persist in looking for a plan though too.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Great read—thanks. I see so many doomsday headlines, and it just encourages nihilism. Not to mention increases my anxiety as a parent.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Content warning: Dark

in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

You can address all kinds of things that make sense to reasonable people, but the world is filled with the greedy and stupid and selfish! But don’t worry, the earth will be fine without us!👻
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I'm on Team Hope with a dash of being realistic.

I am hopeful enough of us can make necessary changes to save plants and animal life on Earth.

I'm realistic due to the damage we've already done -the plants and animals extinct in the last 100 - 200 years - and how many more will become extinct before enough change has been made.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I am reminded very much of Dana Nuccitelli's essay on the 5 stages of denial. Nearly 10 years ago.

"Stage 5 global warming denial involves arguing that it's too late to solve the problem, so we shouldn't bother trying"

https://web.archive.org/web/20131130043242/https://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/sep/16/climate-change-contrarians-5-stages-denial
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I guess we'll find out, won't we? I mean we ain't doing shit to stop climate change. We're going to fuck around and find out. One reason I'm not having kids. Don't want them to suffer.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Nothing has changed, really. We continue to believe in technological fairy tales. Only a massive decrease in energy production and consumption can make a difference. And that is not being seriously considered anywhere.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

climate change denial is not really an opinion but a mental illness and a delusion. Those who deny climate change aim to worsen it, aim to encourage more ecological disasters and aim to encourage another mass extinction
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

George Carlin had a bit along those lines. "Save the earth!?! The earth is gonna be fine. It's us. We're going away."
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

the dark ages lasted 900 years. The real question should be that when a society falls how long does it take for the next wave of society to return to a similar equal or better level of survivability? When the society falls the great loss of knowledge and any cohesion which may have existed sets us back.

In millions of years the fight will be in amongst the planets. Someone else will have no doubt won that fight before us. We struggle to plan long term.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

can’t say I’m on team hope any longer. I think we passed that point already. It doesn’t stop me from doing all I can to help, but with no illusion it will make a difference.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

people talk about saving the planet when they don’t realize it’s the human race that’s at stake. The planet will evolve because of the Anthropocene but whether the planet will remain liveable for us is the question. We need to move to what some call the Ecozoic. Education is key .
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

You're right, it's not the planet we're trying to save, it's the human race, it'll recover in it's own way far quicker without us destroying it.
@mwl
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I've felt this strange comfort, too, that life (as a strategy) is very resilient, even if organisms and species aren't.

My lament is that there are a whole lot of creatures that had the misfortune of living during the Anthropocene and had no choice about their fate.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

💥
@Sheril

Wonder what sort of life might / could evolve if earth's atmosphere had been radically changed and surface temp
much higher than supports life now. Sulphur bacteria round deep sea geysers?

To think most vertebrates and invertebrates would go down with us, caused by our behaviour.

Of course we will probably survive long enough to witness many of our immediate fellow species no longer there. The day we realise there is no bird song will be a sombre one.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

I feel this way as well. Humans managed to distance ourselves from the natural order of things and the sooner the ‘human’ experiment is wrapped up the sooner the Earth can rediscover it’s equilibrium.
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

To be honest: I don't find that very comforting.

So far, we don't know a thing about evolution of consciousness. It may very well be, that the human species is the only one (in the universe?) "tool of the cosmos to understand itself". (Carl Sagan)

I don't agree that it doesn't matter whether "we're part of it or not".
in reply to Sheril Kirshenbaum

Yes, life will go on should we disappear. I cry for the innocent ones we are taking with us.

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.