Skip to main content


Hi #science #research #mastodon community! A few days ago, a post of mine recieved a lot of attention. Thanks for the engagement and the very interesting suggestions! https://neuromatch.social/@LeonDLotter/109632615134117119

On #Twitter, I loved the common practice of writing threads explaining new #preprints and #papers in an understandable way.
I uttered my concern that through the chronological timeline here people might miss interesting science. A solution would be to agree on names for hashtags and/or a.gup.pe groups to ease tracking these "paper threads".

Following tags were named more then once: #newPaper #paperThread #preprint #researchPaper #mastoPrint #tootPrint.
Also, there was #tootorial, but that might be a slightly different category?

I heard people like participation - so let's do a poll! What's your favourite tag for threads explaining research articles? 📊​ Multiple choices possible!

#twitterMigration #scienceTwitter #scientist @academicchatter @neuroscience @cognition @psychology @phdstudents

  • #newPaper (26%, 67 votes)
  • #paperThread (37%, 93 votes)
  • #preprint (27%, 68 votes)
  • #researchPaper (34%, 85 votes)
  • #tootPrint (9%, 23 votes)
250 voters. Poll end: 1 year ago

in reply to Leon Lotter

(I realize that some of these suggestions would best be used simulatenously, e.g., #newPaper and #preprint have obviously different content. What I am searching for is a common tag for *threads* explaining research articles, not only posts announcing a new publication 🙂.
I had to drop one tag bc of the 5-option limit in polls, and I went for #mastoPrint as it was my own suggestion.)

Some further thoughts:
One could combine these tags in a standardized way with research field names, e.g. #newNeuroPaper, #neuroPreprint, or #neuroPaperThread.
Also, please remember to use #camelCase or #CamelCase notation in these tags for screenreader accessibility!

Tagging some people who responded to my first post (sorry for bothering you!):
@mwt @toddhorowitz @achterbrain @PessoaBrain @elduvelle @Brendanjones @gdiak @EricLawton @annettamallon @UlrikeHahn @ryneches @x1l3f @nyates314 @bsweber @ArneBab @tfardet @emergentnexus @DrAnneCarpenter @f @harcel @MarkHanson @Iris
in reply to Leon Lotter

Furthermore, in my first post, many very cool projects were mentioned, aiming to bring "algorithm-curation" to #Mastodon. Here are some links!

A discussion on algorithmic feeds for Mastodon: https://talkpython.fm/episodes/show/390/mastodon-for-python-devs @ryneches

An #algorithm project on Github: https://github.com/hodgesmr/mastodon_digest @x1l3f @MattHodges

Cool projects by @mauforonda: https://mauforonda.github.io/mastodon_digest/ https://github.com/mauforonda/mastodon_email_digest

@icymi_law, a bot that acts as an algorithm, maintained by @Colarusso

And finally, a working app that creates a curated version of your timeline: https://fediview.com/ @Sho_Ishiguro

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.