Search
Items tagged with: AtProto
🚀 The Call for Participation is OPEN! 🎤✨ All good things come in threes – together! 👨👨👧👧
Submit your talks & ideas and be part of #Fediday 2026! 🌐🔥 @ @cbase
👉 ctalx.c-base.org/fediday-2026/
- -
🚀 Der Call for Participation ist OPEN! 🎤✨ Alle guten Dinge sind 3 - zusammen! 👨👨👧👧
Reich deine Talks & Ideen ein und werde Teil vom Fediday 2026! 🌐🔥
👉 ctalx.c-base.org/fediday-2026/
#CFP #OpenCall #FediVerse #Berlin #ActivityPub #AtProto
RE: mas.to/@Aubreader/116330793703…
This article is a must read.
An excerpt: “Why would anyone fund an Atmosphere project if #Bluesky, with $100 million in the bank, might ship a competing feature at any moment? Why would a founder bet their career on this ecosystem? The presentation didn't just hurt Graze. It made the entire ecosystem look unfundable.”
Why do I keep bringing up this topic?
Because #ATproto is often put in the same category as #ActivityPub (“open protocols yay”) but I strongly disagree with that stance
The Marshmallow Test - Bluesky signals it's willing to eat its young | Trezy.comtrezy.com/blog/the-marshmallow…
> At AtmosphereConf, Bluesky celebrated its community, then signaled it's willing to eat them alive. No context. No acknowledgment. I was in the room.
#Bluesky #Graze #ATmosphereConf
WIRED: Would you welcome president Trump if he was debating joining bluesky?
@jay.bsky.team: Yeah, #bluesky is for everyone.
...
I understand that #ATproto should be for everyone, but decentralization means you don't have to allow everyone on your server. They can run their own and everyone can decide how to deal with that. The company doesn't need to make these decisions. She knows this.
I doubt @Gargron would welcome him on #mastodon infrastructure.
Recently there has been a lot of discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol which has been quite dividing and heated.
Yesterday at the Social Web CG meeting (the group that maintains the ActivityPub and related specifications), I proposed releasing a statement that counters the narrative that one of these protocols must win, when both protocols can co-exist and have a lot to learn from each other.
The statement has been co-signed by various members of both Social Web CG, SocialCG, and the AT Protocol community.
“We do not win by tearing each other down, which only emboldens and empowers those who do not want either protocol to succeed.”
“Arguing between us only emboldens those that seek to derail and destroy efforts to build an open social web.”
You can read the full statement here:
writings.thisismissem.social/s…
This was originally in the swicg/general repository, and you can learn about that here:
github.com/swicg/general/blob/…
#activitypub #atprotocol #atproto #SocialWeb
Statement on discourse about ActivityPub and AT Protocol
Foreword This statement was originally published on the swicg/general repository after I had been granted approval to merge.Emelia Smith (Writings of Emelia)
"ATProto does not scale wide: it's a liability to add more fully participating nodes onto the network. Meaningfully self-hosting ATProto is a risk to the ATProto network, there is active reason to disincentivize it for those already participating."
#ChristineLemmerWebber, 2024
dustycloud.org/blog/re-re-blue…
Oof. That is *not* good for the claim that BlueSky's protocol can be as friendly to decentralisation and independent hosting as the fediverse.
IMHO that's game, set and match.
Activitypub or Atproto ... one item that both Mastodon have in common with Bluesky is amount of "spam" links and accounts boosting those "spammy" accounts
Several "award winning art / photo" profiles I saw had 5 or more links including their pinned post
Win goes to Bluesky since they seem to have better control of that ... for now
#photography #mastodon
#pixelfed #misskey #lemmy #opensource #foss #bluesky #atproto #fediverse #activitypub
