Skip to main content



Great article!

Why Don’t People Return Their Shopping Carts? A (Somewhat) Scientific Investigation


"...I watched a total of 564 encounters between Cart Narcs and cart abandoners. These don’t represent a perfectly random sample of interactions, but together they capture a broad cross-section of everyday behavior. (And, as far as I know, it’s the largest archive of shopping cart behavior available.) Most interactions begin the same way: Someone leaves their cart and a Cart Narc requests they return it. At this point I documented what happened next, transcribing parking lot reactions word for unhinged word. To be clear, this was not a quick process. I spent dozens of weekend hours hunched over my computer pausing and replaying YouTube videos. People in my life called this “concerning” and a “waste of time.” I called it research."

in reply to Muse

I see that more at Costco, lots of abandoned giant carts along the edges mostly.
The sense of relief at getting out of there and stowing your loot in the car overrides "duty to return to the cart pen".
in reply to Muse

Here, a store employee pushes your cart to your car and loads your purchases for you. Then he takes the cart back with him. No problem.


This contestant for Miss World Chile actually won her place in the World finals with this progressive death metal song that she wrote. Amazing! Not for the faint of heart! @Christoph S

youtu.be/FwbZrdSGlmE

in reply to Muse

Saw her on Last Week Tonight. It was...different.


i wonder if early text to speech models in satnavs had to have an entirely separate pronunciation ruleset for british place names.

a rule that says "louce" sounds the same as "louse" is all well and good until you have to say "gloucestershire", or as your naïvely programmed TTS model may call it, "glough-cest-er-shy-er"

and i can't imagine how you'd handle things like en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cholmond… without just hard-coding them

This entry was edited (1 month ago)



While cleaning a storage room, our staff found this tape containing #UNIX v4 from Bell Labs, circa 1973

Apparently no other complete copies are known to exist: gunkies.org/wiki/UNIX_Fourth_E…

We have arranged to deliver it to the Computer History Museum

#retrocomputing



“Multiple UNC-Chapel Hill faculty and student groups organized collective actions speaking out against the compact, including a SUNRISE UNC protest shortly before the Faculty Council meeting and a petition from the Coalition for Carolina that has amassed over 1,750 signatures.”

Organize

wunc.org/education/2025-11-10/…



I'm starting a couple hashtags to help certain creators find one another.

#CreativeResisters for people who are contributing their creative skills to overcome abusive governments and economic systems.

#Hopecore for people who are creating works whose purpose is to portray the creating and maintaining of a world worth hoping for.

Please use these whenever you see anything that fits the bill!

in reply to Muse

Hashtags are not case sensitive, but capitalizing the words helps screenreaders pronounce them for the visually impaired.
in reply to Muse

Thanks! I had always thought they were case-sensitive (without testing).

;-\



Wednesday! Join me for a Metagov Seminar with my colleague Dr. Orit Peleg from CU Boulder, a computer scientist who does the most wonderful work on self-governance among plants and insects—this is going to be glorious: luma.com/pzbp4zq1?tk=vQCJE3



Censorship may be a cat-and-mouse game, but our teams are staying ahead. If you want to hear more about our ongoing fight for online freedom, join us for our State of the Onion event on November 12 at 17:00 UTC. 📺

youtube.com/watch?v=fTDtUoauU7…

in reply to The Tor Project

Suppose you have a site that has banned all the Tor exit nodes. Also suppose you have a shell account somewhere. Install Chromium in Tails, and then do this:

ssh -D 8888 user@shell-account-host
[separate window]
chromium '--proxy-server=socks://localhost:8888'

Now the SSH goes over Tor, and the Chromium uses the SSH tunnel to send its traffic out via the shell host. You can get around the Tor Browser and exit node bans this way. Handy if you are in a censored environment.




Privacy never looked so good. 👌

Nextcloud Files got a stunning mobile redesign in #NextcloudHub 25 Autumn, including #LiquidGlass UI on iOS.

🎥 All Files updates: youtu.be/fbFM58Ex9fI
🔥 Full release video: youtu.be/3jcYJGQgenI

in reply to Nextcloud 📱☁️💻

Privacy huh? Is that why you guys want to direct us to Youtube (Google)?
Kinda odd.

Better start a channel on #PeerTube .

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to RubenWA

@RubenWA we are exploring the opportunities with PeerTube. It is clear a lot of people would prefer to watch our videos there, but it needs additional capacity. Thanks for sharing your preference!


#Conversatorio

Inteligencia Artificial Feminista: Marcos, Prácticas, Rechazos.

Este miércoles 12 de noviembre a las 7:30 CDMX | 8:30 ET | 10:30 ARG/URY/BRA | 13:30 BST | 19:00 IST

Registro y más información:

datoscontrafeminicidio.net/ia-…



The rarest species of #orangutan, the #Tapanuli is on the verge of being lost forever due to #palmoil and #mining #deforestation destroying 80% of their range. Say no to #ecocide ⛔️🙊🔥🌴🪔 when you shop #BoycottPalmOil #Boycott4Wildlife @palmoildetect.bsky.social palmoildetectives.com/2021/01/…


Talking point - what have you be playing recently? gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/talk…

#Gaming #PCGaming #Linux #LinuxGaming

in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

I've been playing Final Fantasy XIV (despite all the DDoS attacks--got d/c'd three times in one day on Sunday) and Cozy Grove. I'm still newish to FF14, so I've been enjoying the story. Cozy Grove is just a nice relaxing game (similar to Animal Crossing) that has interesting stories. Both are playable on steam deck.


Crimson Freedom could be one to watch for single-player RTS fans gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/crim…

#CrimsonFreedom #RTS #Gaming #PCGaming



This new release marks a major milestone for the open document standard! 💪🎉

itsfoss.com/news/odf-1-4-relea…

#opensource #odf

in reply to It's FOSS

"The feature freeze for ODF 1.4 was over two years ago, so while the list of changes is extensive the focus here is not on ‘new’ features that contemporary office suite users haven’t seen before, but improvements to bring ODF more in-line with current expectations."

Honestly I appreciate these "expectation" updates a lot. This is the stuff that makes it easier to recommend.



The EasySMX X05 Pro wireless controller is cheap, feature-filled and comfortable with a big flaw gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/the-…

#EasySMX #X05Pro #Gaming #PCGaming



D7VK brings Direct3D 7 to Linux using Vulkan based on DXVK gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/d7vk…

#Linux #OpenSource #Vulkan #Direct3D #D7VK #DXVK

in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

I mean, cool project, I do wonder about how useful it ends up being though. DX8 and below should be perfectly covered by Wine's own OpenGL renderer backend by now, right?
This entry was edited (1 month ago)


THRASHER is thoroughly weird and it's out now as the follow up to THUMPER gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/thra…

#THRASHER #IndieGames #Linux #SteamDeck




Halls of Torment is still probably the best survivor-like with The Boglands DLC and free update out now gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/hall…

#HallsofTorment #PCGaming #Linux #Gaming #SteamDeck



JohnsonAndJohnson @JNJNews use "sustainable" #palmoil yet they continue with mass #deforestation #extinction 🦏🐘🦧 for #palmoil ☠️🌴🪔⛔️. Say no to their #greed and #greenwashing!
When you shop #BoycottPalmOil #Boycott4Wildlife @palmoildetect.bsky.social palmoildetectives.com/2021/02/…

in reply to It's FOSS

To be fair, the "cannot afford Unix" isn't exactly true. He had Minix, he just hated it AFAIK (source: "Just for Fun: The Story of an Accidental Revolutionary" by Linus Torvalds and David Diamond).


Get The Sinking City Remastered and a lot of Sherlock Holmes in this Humble Bundle gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/get-…

#GameBundle #Gaming #PCGaming



Powerful rulers of the skies in #Colombia #Brazil and #Ecuador, Orange-breasted Falcons 🦅 face threats from #palmoil #meat #soy #gold #deforestation across their range. Fight for them when you shop #Boycottpalmoil 🚫#BoycottGold 🪙 #Boycott4Wildlife🌳 wp.me/pcFhgU-8tM?utm_source=ma…


Linux Mint to get an upgraded System Information tool and a spruced up system menu gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/linu…

#Linux #LinuxMint #LinuxGaming

in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

This is awesome! As much as I like using Mint and Cinnamon DE, the menu has always looked and felt dated. Even in the 2010s it looked dated.


The popular Easy Effects app swaps from GTK over to Qt, QML and Kirigami with a big new release gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/the-…

#Linux #OpenSource #EasyEffects

in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

Surprising that they ported everything I imagine that there were limitation they could not overcome without switching to QT.


Open science provides fraud deterrence, and facilitates fraud detection.

When I first learned about open science around 20 years ago (then called "open notebook science"), I never thought about research fraud. Now it is a critically-important issue.

Open science practices provide part of the records needed for data provenance or chain-of-custody trail. Here's one of my posts from earlier this year about fraud deterrence: alexholcombe.wordpress.com/202… .

So in my view, open science policy updates need to consider fraud deterrence. Disappointed to see no consideration of the issue in the TOP guidelines update. journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.11…

in reply to 〽️ɪɢᴜᴇʟ

@bitbraindev You are asking "what else should we evaluate (people who spent a decade learning their craft) by?"

There is only a single method that actually works:

Trust other scientists in the same field (only they can actually understand the research) and punish proven fraud by expulsion.

Competition for jobs doesn’t work in science.

Giving publications a secondary objective ("get a job") ruins them for their prime objective (communicate).

draketo.de/english/science/qua…

@albertcardona @alexh

in reply to ArneBab

@ArneBab @bitbraindev
Indeed – publishing's purpose is to communicate their progress in scientific research. Nothing else, nothing more.

On the measure and evaluation of science, I continue to think Ross Cagan's vision is best:
mathstodon.xyz/@albertcardona/…

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Albert Cardona

@albertcardona I think the part "it was pretty much a given if you were doing good work." is the most important in that.

Don’t constantly stress people about their employment future while they are working for you. That stress steals focus from the work they are doing that actually benefits society.

@bitbraindev @alexh

in reply to ArneBab

@ArneBab @albertcardona @bitbraindev the idea of counting papers is especially ridiculous when considering that evaluating the long term impact of scientific work has always been notoriously difficult. The early work on mRNA vaccine technology, CRISPR, restriction enzymes, you name it, comprised only a small number of papers that ended up being very influential much later.
in reply to ArneBab

@ArneBab @bitbraindev @albertcardona there is also an obsession with over evaluation. We need to learn to be okay with not evaluating/comparing people.
in reply to Frank Aylward

@ArneBab @bitbraindev @albertcardona i will say that it can be difficult to retain one's love of science when they are forced to work in an ecosystem of constant evaluation and comparison, even when it is obvious that so much of it is meaningless. I see this as a primary reason why so many people leave the community.
in reply to Frank Aylward

@foaylward There’s some background from concept discussed in the book Thinking Fast and Slow:

Since you often only know years (decades) later whether some research was important, building intuition can’t work and creating metrics that quantify that is a fools errant.

But people try anyway. It looks a lot like superstition caused by a need to have certainty.

Either an emotional need or as a cover-my-ass method in case something doesn’t work out.

@bitbraindev @albertcardona @alexh

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to ArneBab

@ArneBab @foaylward @bitbraindev @albertcardona Does it really take decades to know though? This feels like one of those things people say, like “protein has to be the genetic material because nucleic acid is too simple” or “bacteria don’t have genes”.

Where is the systematic evidence (not anecdata) that this is true?

in reply to Kristine Willis

@ArneBab @foaylward @bitbraindev @albertcardona I happened to be re-reading “Science, the endless frontier” recently and it seems possible that this idea comes from Vannevar, who asserts it pretty much in this exact form; and I am beginning to suspect it’s something people have just been repeating for .. decades, because it feels true.
in reply to Kristine Willis

@kristine_willis If you want to check that, the easiest sanity check could be to investigate when the science that led to Nobel prizes later on was recognized as groundbreaking.

The next step could be to check which requirements these had to be possible and how long it took for those requirements to be recognized as important (time after publication).

@foaylward @bitbraindev @albertcardona @alexh

in reply to ArneBab

@ArneBab could not agree more, this is an obvious test. But, we have to define "recognition".

I suspect that the immediate field recognizes breakthroughs much more rapidly than the broader scientific community, and I would hypothesize that perhaps the lag time between recognition by practitioners of a sub-specialty and recognition by the scientific community in general is what give the appearance of a long delay.

@foaylward @bitbraindev @albertcardona @alexh

in reply to Kristine Willis

@ArneBab The sleeping beauty phenomenon you're describing in comp sci fits a different pattern where neighboring practitioners don't recognize the immediate utility (and maybe they never do, it's some other community that finds the utility). But this just means, I think, there can be delays, not that the delay in recognition is obligatory.

@foaylward @bitbraindev @albertcardona @alexh

in reply to Kristine Willis

@ArneBab We may be violently agreeing here. But I seem to hear the "you can never know" line rolled out as a kind of bromide to provide cover to funding work that, as a subject matter expert, I'm pretty sure is a dead letter.

Of course I could be wrong. Sure. Absolutely. The problem is, our resources are finite, and I wonder to what extent this paradigm is undermining progress by contributing to problematic hyper competition. @foaylward @bitbraindev @albertcardona @alexh

in reply to Kristine Willis

@kristine_willis @ArneBab @foaylward @bitbraindev
A key point here is that in scientific research competition is counterproductive. That no scientist in their right mind would want to compete with anyone. And if a work is so obvious that multiple labs are on it, collaboration beats competition any day. There's no point in being a month faster and scooping someone; even the concept of scooping is absurd: if anything, that'd be confirmation, validation – and very valuable. Most, though, would rather work on questions whose answers push the horizon of knowledge.

Resources are indeed finite, hence let's stop competition for papers, for grants, for positions. There is no point in that. Define what size of scientific research sector can the country support and go with that, with properly funded labs.

#academia #ScientificPublishing

in reply to Albert Cardona

@albertcardona I see two different aspects:

One is that funding is provided by people outside the field, and they want proof of value. But they don’t want to trust the people within the field ("they all know each other, so how can they be objective?"). So they request something impossible.

The second is that abuse of funds absolutely does happen, and bad theories often only die with their generation. So there *is* need for funding of outsiders.

@kristine_willis @foaylward @bitbraindev @alexh

in reply to ArneBab

@albertcardona The current solution is to make the most accomplished scientists waste at least a third of their time writing grants just so people they know are doing good work have a chance to continue their work.

And the missing job security kills a lot of good work because people are on the edge instead of focusing on their passion.

So the current situation is just bad.

The only ones who benefit are administrations who can point to metrics.

@kristine_willis @foaylward @bitbraindev @alexh

in reply to ArneBab

@albertcardona "We did not choose wrong: here are the numbers to prove that our selection is the only correct one, so if it does not work out, we are not responsible."

@kristine_willis @foaylward @bitbraindev @alexh

in reply to ArneBab

@ArneBab @albertcardona Completely agree that the failure to right-size and instead attempt infinite growth has been a very serious mistake; that sets up an insane and counterproductive competition in the place of what should be collaborative discussions. And also agree that a lack of stability is disastrous and kills good ideas. @foaylward @bitbraindev @alexh
in reply to Kristine Willis

@ArneBab @albertcardona But this just means pushing decision-making back a step; who gets to have the stable career? What is the “right size” research enterprise? How do we decide that? As a scientist, I just don’t see how we make those decisions in a data-free way. @foaylward @bitbraindev @alexh
in reply to Kristine Willis

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Albert Cardona

@albertcardona @ArneBab @foaylward @bitbraindev I’ve spent a decade up-close and personal with the “bring outsiders to evaluate” model and in my experience, as a stand-alone solution, it leaves a lot to be desired. Not least that if you ask different “outsiders” you get different results.
in reply to Kristine Willis

@albertcardona @ArneBab @foaylward @bitbraindev and, at the same time, there are some important topics that all the outside reviewers universally down-rank: health disparities. Women’s health. Bio-engineering.
science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv…
When you make judgements by asking a limited number of experts for their subjective feelings, you get … uneven results.
in reply to Kristine Willis

@kristine_willis @ArneBab @foaylward @bitbraindev
Indeed, the evaluation problem is a tough one. Two points.

1. Outsider perspectives are always needed. Hence I'd value most an evaluation committee composed on 1/3 internal, 1/3 national, 1/3 international. The result should be biased towards not squashing potentially great people or projects, at the cost of letting some less good ones continue. While the cost of an error in the latter is small, the cost on the former is gigantic.

2. Since it's impossible to be perfect, I'd use, again the Ross Cagan proposal of funding levels: go up, go down, and so on, depending on past performance, not future perspectives. In other words, no grants: the evaluation is done on past work only.

#academia

in reply to Didier Ruedin

@druedin @kristine_willis @ArneBab @foaylward @bitbraindev
Same as now: who is interested, who did a sensible internship or rotation, who do you happen to know, who has sensible grades on relevant subjects, who can come up with a project proposal that reads sensible. Plus the equivalent of a visitor project for juniors: short-term positions of 3 months to a year where they can prove themselves. Actual work in a lab is the best recruitment basis there is.

Frankly, my problem is finding people who want to work in academic scientific research. There aren't enough. And the issue isn't entirely salaries, which is a major one. It's also that not everybody is comfortably being wrong all day long, all year wrong, not knowing exactly how to do something, not knowing what the outcome may be. Perhaps this can be learned, but at the PhD/postdoc level it may be too late.

#academia

in reply to Albert Cardona

@albertcardona @druedin @kristine_willis @ArneBab @bitbraindev if resources are highly limiting it will always lead to difficult decisions based on questionable metrics. But this is a false choice. We live in a world where a psychopath tech bro just got a trillion dollar pay package. Science thrives when we have money to fund people who don't excel at traditionable metrics, and there is plenty of money to make that happen, if we as a society choose.




Fantasy Grounds virtual tabletop (VTT) is now free to play gamingonlinux.com/2025/11/fant…

#VTT #FantasyGrounds #Unity #Gaming

in reply to Liam @ GamingOnLinux 🐧🎮

oh wow, they have thousands of books at full MSRP? I wish Steam still had an “add all to cart for $$$$$$$” button to total that up.



Digital ownership is a myth unless you control your files, formats, keys, and server.

itsfoss.com/news/digital-conte…

#foss #digitalownership

Unknown parent



A native GNOME office suite? It’s overdue. Let’s bring it back.

itsfoss.com/gnome-office-reviv…

#linux #gnome

in reply to It's FOSS

Yes, we need a lightweight alternative to #LibreOffice that integrates with the #Gnome desktop. However, we don't need a new office core, just a slim UI. #LibreOfficeKit is slim and extremely powerful. All documents supported by @libreoffice are displayed correctly immediately. @CollaboraOffice Onlline, iOS, Android uses it. @tdforg has already developed a prototype ‘#GTK Tiled Viewer’ dev.blog.documentfoundation.or…. I hope someone is interested in taking on the new @gnome office.


Sambar deer are #vulnerable from habitat destruction for #timber and #palmoil and relentless hunting. Help them survive, be #vegan for them and #BoycottPalmOil and #Boycott4Wildlife to safeguard these magnificent beings. Learn more via @palmoildetect wp.me/pcFhgU-75t?utm_source=ma…

in reply to It's FOSS

Good.

Because it's really hard to copy/paste a command line or registry key from a video, often hard or impossible to read, and shown only in a single frame. And when there are Youtube videos on the subject, that's all Google will give.

Some things really should be text (with screenshots when relevant) and not a video.

in reply to It's FOSS

This does seem to be hinting it is a mistake, but but it is clearly not, along with those documenting human rights violations ibtimes.com/why-did-youtube-de…


I’m enjoying this thread in which someone with one follower whose account was created this summer is attempting to tell a very prolific, popular, and long-established user about the cultural norms of the Fediverse. 🍿 federate.social/@mattblaze/115…


Pooch rave!
"Spot and the Sub-woofers"

youtu.be/2L_RI2837dU

in reply to Muse

I saw a dog with a glow in the dark collar the other day. Seemed like a good idea.


Capacitive Touch Keyboard Business Card


This looks like fun!

Lo, thar be cookies on this site to keep track of your login. By clicking 'okay', you are CONSENTING to this.